The use of quantitative and qualitative criteria in the measurement of performance in small firms

By Robin Jarvis, J. Curran, John Kitching, Geoffrey Lightfoot. 2000

181 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb8bfbced5648fa0d46a505f0d8de15fabbe8999

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. J. Padmore
2. Mike Simpson
3. Nicki Newman
4. Allan Macpherson
5. Dilani Jayawarna
6. Diamanto Politis

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Padmore
2. Mike Simpson
3. Nicki Newman
4. Allan Macpherson
5. Dilani Jayawarna
6. Diamanto Politis
7. J. Brix

Citations in the corpus

• Towards a new model of success and performance in SMEs (2012, background): “Many SMEs owner-managers do not run their businesses to maximise financial performance but instead run their businesses for other reasons such as lifestyle ( Jarvis et al., 2000; Jennings and Beaver, 1997; Walker et al., 1999; Walker and Brown, 2004) and satisficing behaviour is often encountered in”
• Training commitment and performance in manufacturing SMEs: Incidence, intensity and approaches (2007, background): “While there are a number of possible measures of firm performance, several authors (for example, Jarvis et al. , 2000”
• Improving control through effective performance measurement in SMEs (2001, background): “According to Jarvis et al. (2000) SMEs predominantly focus their performance measures on cash ow.”
• Business angels and value added: what do we know and where do we go? (2008, background): “Subjective measures of firm performance and measures that seek to combine personal and economic measures of success (Jarvis et al. 2000; Pelham 1997; van Gelderen, Frese, and Thurik 2000) could also be considered.”