Multi-View Stereo Revisited
By Michael Goesele, Brian Curless, S. M. Seitz. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006
415 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb5bf59928528869f82e8522d15f77c22a753b29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
- Yasutaka Furukawa
- Marc Pollefeys
- Carlos Hernández
- S. M. Seitz
- Brian Curless
- George Vogiatzis
- Andreas Geiger
- Philippos Mordohai
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Jitendra Malik
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Andreas Geiger
- Andrew Zisserman
- Marc Pollefeys
- Xiaogang Wang
- Dacheng Tao
Citations in the corpus
- Using Multiple Hypotheses to Improve Depth-Maps for Multi-View Stereo (2008, methodology): “The works of [7, 6] have used derivatives of this technique with slight modifications, for example the inclusion of a Parzen window to filter the consensus matches in [6].”
- Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multiview Stereopsis (2010, background): “Approaches based on multiple depth maps [14], [15], [16] are more flexible, but require fusing individual depth maps into a single 3D model.”
- Efficient Multi-View Reconstruction of Large-Scale Scenes using Interest Points, Delaunay Triangulation and Graph Cuts (2007, background): “outdor architectural scenes) are those representing geometry by several depth maps [18, 17, 23, 37, 38, 39].”
- Multi-View Stereo: A Tutorial (2015, methodology): “Reconstruction results of a winner-takes-all depthmap algorithm with a robust photo-consistency function by Goesele, Curless, and Seitz [80] are given in Figure 3.”
- Large-Scale Data for Multiple-View Stereopsis (2016, methodology): “Most successful MVS algorithms can be divided into two main categories: point-cloud-based methods (e.g. Campbell et al. 2008; Tola et al. 2012; Goesele et al. 2006; Hiep et al. 2009; Furukawa and Ponce 2010; Vogiatzis et al. 2007) and volume-based methods (e.g. Liu and Cooper 2011; Kolev et al.…”
- Multi-View Stereo for Community Photo Collections (2007, methodology): “A number of recent stereo matching methods have used outlier rejection techniques to identify occlusions in the matching step [4, 6].”
- Continuous depth estimation for multi-view stereo (2009, methodology): “In recent years, Goesele [ 10 ] revisits depth map based approaches using pixel by pixel window matching technique to retrieve the high fidelity matching pixels and merge the resulted depth maps using volumetric meshing algorithms.”
- Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multi-View Stereopsis (2007, background): “Approaches based on multiple depth maps [14], [15], [16] are more flexible, but require fusing individual depth maps into a single 3D model.”
- Detailed Real-Time Urban 3D Reconstruction from Video (2007, background): “[24] presented a two-stage algorithm which merges depth maps produced by a simple algorithm.”
- Global Optimization for Shape Fitting (2007, methodology): “To test this, we considered incomplete meshes produced by mutltiview reconstruction method [ 8 ] on Middlebury multiview stereo page datasets [17] kindly provided by the authors of [8].”
- A Globally Optimal Algorithm for Robust TV-L1 Range Image Integration (2007, background): “The concavity visible in the second view on the mesh (Figure 3(d)) indicates a challenging region, where many multiview stereo methods have difficulties (e.g. [13] [29] [28]).”
- Real-Time Visibility-Based Fusion of Depth Maps (2007, background): “[6] presented a two-stage approach which merges depth maps produced by a simple algorithm.”
- High Accuracy and Visibility-Consistent Dense Multiview Stereo (2012, neutral): “The performance of some depth maps-based methods [36], [58], [56], [22], [57], [23], [24] for complete reconstruction, however, seems to be lower than previously discussed approaches, as regards either accuracy or completeness of the obtained model.”
- Large Scale Multi-view Stereopsis Evaluation (2014, neutral): “Feature expansion [3] and depthmap fusion [2, 5, 7, 19, 20].”
- A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms (2006, result): “[63] compute a depth map from each camera viewpoint (similar to [31]) and merge the results using VRIP [62].”