Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams
By S. Armstrong, V. Priola. 2001
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
When assembling self-managing work teams, the personalities of team members are often overlooked. One personality variable known to be critical for effective decision making in teams is cognitive style. This study sought to examine how differences and similarities in analytic/intuitive cognitive styles affected the behavior of team members on the task/emotionally expressive dimension identified by Bales. As hypothesized, intuitive individuals and homogeneous intuitive teams were found to initiate more social-emotional acts. Contrary to expectations, intuitive rather than analytic individuals and homogeneous intuitive rather than analytic teams engaged in more task-oriented behaviors. Teams also tended to select intuitive individuals as leaders. The possibility that different combinations of styles may be important for overall team effectiveness was subsequently discussed, and it was suggested that this may depend on whether the nature of the work environment is relatively well structured and mechanistic or relatively unstructured and organic.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb4a085d3bda046aec4b67da3f5e301c2cb2d0b1
Citations in the corpus
- Role of Cognitive Styles in Business and Management: Reviewing 40 Years of Research (2012, unknown): “Intuitive individuals and homogeneous intuitive teams outperformed their analytical counterparts when the nature of the work environment was unstructured and organic (Armstrong and Priola 2001).”