Rebellion as a Quasi-Criminal Activity
By Paul Collier. 2000
628 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb1e0b594fecefa136fc56e7d5ac5b9bcb72c1b1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Nicholas Sambanis
- Anke Hoeffler
- Indra de Soysa
- Eric Neumayer
- Paul Collier
- Todd Sandler
- Ola Olsson
- James C. Murdoch
In Sociology and Political Science
- Nicholas Sambanis
- Indra de Soysa
- Todd Sandler
- Anke Hoeffler
- James C. Murdoch
- Paul Collier
- Eric Neumayer
- Michael L. Ross
Citations in the corpus
- Understanding Civil War (2002, background): “JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTIONCollier, Sambanis / UNDERSTANDING CIVIL WAR”
- AID, Policy and Peace: Reducing the risks of civil conflict (2002, methodology): “While the Grossman model focuses upon the revenues to be captured by rebellion, that of Collier (2000) introduces costs of rebellion and develops a condition for financial viability.”
- Ecoviolence: Shrinking Pie, or Honey Pot? (2002, background): “Collier 2000b; Collier and Hoefºer 1998; and Collier and Hoefºer 2000.”
- Civil wars and economic growth: A regional comparison (2002, background): “In other situations, civil wars may be rooted in greed as opposing interests vie for resource wealth (Collier, 2000; Collier and Hoeffler, 1998; 2002).”
- Resource Wealth and the Risk of Civil War Onset: Results from a New Dataset of Natural Resource Rents, 1970—1999 (2007, positive): “However, the import of the theoretical argument presented by Collier (2000b) that government control of resources at very high levels of dependence deters rebellion has serious implications.”
- On the Incidence of Civil War in Africa (2002, methodology): “The model is based on an analytic model that is in the rational choice tradition (Collier 2000).”
- Congo: The Prize of Predation (2004, methodology): “The predator–prey model that we present follows in the spirit of the appropriative conflict literature (Hirshleifer, 1991; Neary, 1997; Collier, 2000; Skaperdas, 2002; Mehlum, Moene & Torvik, 2003), in particular Grossman (1991, 1999) and Grossman & Kim (1995).”