AID, Policy and Peace: Reducing the risks of civil conflict
By Paul Collier, Anke Hoeffler. 2002
259 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbef3f1458a98df069d88889d91ea7fd17290c99
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Aiding Violence or Peace? The Impact of Foreign Aid on the Risk of Civil Conflict in Sub-Saharan Africa (2009, methodology): “The remaining data includes a set of country control variables similar to those used by Collier and Hoeffler (2002), Miguel et al. (2004a), and Fearon and Laitin (2003b).”
- Unintended Consequences: Does Aid Promote Arms Races? (2007, unknown): “This prediction is based on the core model as presented in Collier and Hoeffler (2002a) .”
- The Economic Legacy of Civil War (2013, unknown): “To date, the economic consequences of civil war and its aftermath have been investigated predominantly at the macroeconomic level, using national accounts data to estimate its impact on gross domestic product (GDP; Barro 1991; Collier 1999; Collier and Hoeffler 2002, 2004, 2008).”
- US Food Aid and Civil Conflict (2014, background): “Collier and Hoeffler (2002) find that total official development assistance (ODA) has no effect on conflict globally, while de Ree and Nillesen (2009) find that total ODA reduces conflict.”
- The Political Economy of Civil War in Nepal (2006, background): “Collier and Hoeffler (2002) did not find statistically significant links between civil unrest and economic inequality, political rights, and ethnic polarization.”
- Resource Rents, Governance, and Conflict (2005, background): “In Collier and Hoeffler (2002), we found that aid has no effect other than through its effect on growth, which was benign.”
- When Globalization Discontent Turns Violent: Foreign Economic Liberalization and Internal War (2007, background): “While Bussmann, Schneider, and Wiesehomeier (2005) cannot show for sub-Saharan Africa a robust impact of conditional lending by the IMF on the risk of conflict, Collier and Hoeffler (2002) demonstrate that aid reduces the conflict propensity of a state only indirectly through increased growth.”
- Making Progress on Foreign Aid (2015, background): “Other studies, such as Collier and Hoeffler (2002), argue that aid flows can reduce conflict because increasing aid revenues can relax government budget constraints, which can increase military spending and deter opposing groups from engaging in conflict.”
- Aid, policy and growth in post-conflict societies (2002, methodology): “Since aid tends, through its growth effects, to reduce the risk of conflict (Collier and Hoeffler, 2002), the aid allocation warranted on the criterion of poverty reduction will also contribute to peace-building.”
- Tracking Underreported Financial Flows: China’s Development Finance and the Aid–Conflict Nexus Revisited (2017, unknown): “23 which Chinese aid could potentially influence the onset of conflict is through its impact on trade (since an economic contraction could hasten the onset of a conflict and an economic expansion could forestall conflict, see Collier et al. 2002, Miguel et al. 2004, and de Ree and Nillesen 2009); ho”
- Extending the concept of the resource curse: natural resources and public spending on health (2014, background): “Another factor that has been commonly mentioned in the resource curse literature (Collier and Hoeffler, 2003; Ross, 2003; Cotet and Tsui, 2013) and can influence public spending on health is the occurrence of conflict.”
- The Politics of Effective Foreign Aid (2010, background): “…to be correlated with things such as civil conflict and coups that also affect growth, calling into question its usefulness as an instrument even before we consider the fact that aid might be causally related to military spending, coups, and conflict (Grossman 1992; Collier & Hoeffler 2002, 2007).”
- Ending Africa's Poverty Trap (2004, unknown): “Collier and Hoeffler (2002a, 2002b).”