Development and Validation of the Motivational Climate Scale for Youth Sports

By Ronald E. Smith, S. Cumming, F. Smoll. 2008

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb07206c217c4812e02d6d8d4ef9f8000022b9d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. J. Côté
2. J. Deakin
3. S. Cumming
4. Ronald E. Smith
5. F. Smoll
6. Dany J. MacDonald
7. D. O’Rourke
8. Mark A Eys

In Safety Research

1. J. Côté
2. S. Cumming
3. Ronald E. Smith
4. F. Smoll
5. J. Deakin
6. Mark A Eys
7. Dany J. MacDonald
8. D. O’Rourke

In Social Psychology

1. J. Côté
2. S. Cumming
3. Ronald E. Smith
4. F. Smoll
5. J. Deakin
6. Dany J. MacDonald
7. D. O’Rourke
8. Mark A Eys

Citations in the corpus

• Motivational climate and changes in young athletes’ achievement goal orientations (2009, methodology): “The Motivational Climate Scale for Youth Sports ( Smith et al. 2008 ) was used to measure athlete perceptions of coach-initiated motivational climate.”
• Relations of Parent- and Coach-Initiated Motivational Climates to Young Athletes’ Self-Esteem, Performance Anxiety, and Autonomous Motivation: Who Is More Influential? (2014, methodology): “However, we now know that concepts from AGT apply in children younger than 12 (e.g., Keegan et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2008) and the reading level and reliability of our scales appear acceptable.”
• The role of enjoyment and motivational climate in relation to the personal development of team sport athletes. (2011, methodology): “The two factor model tested by Smith et al. (2008) demonstrated strong psychometric properties with values of Q = 1.52, CFI = .97, GFI = .97, and RMSEA = .04.”