Real world research : a resource for users of social research methods in applied settings
By C. Robson. 2011
1,413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baeb7f3f4bf420412cb90329df90006e84311350
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- A. Gouldson
- M. Powell
- Ruth E. Bush
- Heng Hou
- William F. Gale
- P. Taylor
- C. Bale
- H. Mohajan
Citations in the corpus
- A Critical Review of Qualitative Interviews (2014, methodology): “On the other hand, Robson (2011) warns interviewers not to ask long questions, as it may decrease the interviewee’s understanding of the whole question.”
- Two Criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and Reliability (2017, background): “Validity of a research instrument assesses the extent to which the instrument measures what it is designed to measure [Robson, 2011].”
- What makes an online community of practice work? A situated study of Chinese student teachers’ perceptions of online professional learning (2015, background): “…factors included student teachers facing the extra burden of confronting something new when they were already pressurised by placement teaching; being uncertain about what benefits online communication could bring to them; and potential interference from the researcher's presence (Robson, 2011).”
- The role of intermediaries in low carbon transitions – Empowering innovations to unlock district heating in the UK (2017, methodology): “A thematic analysis method was used (Braun and Clarke, 2006; Robson, 2002) to categorise the data from the decision theatre into the four intermediary functions set out in Tables 1 and 2.”