Higher Order, Multisample, Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Fourth Edition: What Does It Measure?.
By T. Keith, J. Fine, Gordon E. Taub, Matthew R. Reynolds, J. Kranzler. 2006
243 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba8bbcb99cb29297636f1ac90b46f1d3f0166e2c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Hsinyi Chen
- T. Keith
- L. G. Weiss
- Matthew R. Reynolds
- Yung-Hwa Chen
- Jianjun Zhu
- B. Chang
- K. McGrew
Citations in the corpus
- What Does the WISC-IV Measure?-Validation of the Scoring and CHC-based Interpretative Approaches (2009, methodology): “children, the Arithmetic subtest may be considered primarily as a measure of fluid reasoning (Keith et al., 2006) or quantitative knowledge (Phelps et al.”
- Test Review: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) (2006, unknown): “…the use of the WISC-IV, particularly when it is interpreted within the context of Flanagan and Kaufman’s (2004) comprehensive interpretive approach—an approach that is grounded in current CHC research and that is consistent with current theory-driven WISC-IV research (viz., Keith et al., 2006).”
- Cattell-Horn-Carroll Abilities and Cognitive Tests: What We've Learned from 20 Years of Research. (2010, methodology): “A curious Þnding of the CFA research using a WISC-IV four-factor model, however, was that Arithmetic had the highest loading on the Gsm factor, and the Gsm factor had the highest loading on g (Keith et al., 2006).”
- WAIS-IV and Clinical Validation of the Four- and Five-Factor Interpretative Approaches (2013, methodology): “Our results are consistent with previous studies by Keith et al. (2006), and Chen et al. (2009) in supporting an alternative five-factor model, but we did not find evidence of clear superiority for one model over another.”