Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject

By C. Ellis, Arthur P. Bochner. 2000

3,107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba1fc949dce094d4876913d068ded25d37305ee2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Handbook of Autoethnography (2021, background): “…- oped to evaluate essays are of little use because it checks composition and grammatical accuracy rather than the kind of critical inquiry students develop from reflexively rewriting in autoethnography (Berry, 2013; Ellis & Bochner, 2000) or reenacting in performance ethnography (Alexander, 2013).”
Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms La autoetnografía como un método de investigación: ventajas, limitaciones y críticas (2013, methodology): “Vol. 15 • Number 2 • Bogotá, Colombia. p. 279 - 287 Autoethnography as a research method: Advantages, limitations and criticisms that Ellis and Bochner (2000) define as "...an autobiographical genre of writing that displays multiple layers of consciousness, connecting the personal to the cultural"…”
Living Autoethnography: Connecting Life and Research (2010, methodology): “First, autoethnography is a qualitative research method (Chang, 2007; Denzin, 2006; Ellis, 2004; Ellis & Bochner, 2000).”
Qualitative Interviewing as an Embodied Emotional Performance (2010, background): “Enosh and Buchbinder (2005) described the narrative style of “self-observation” as produced by an interviewing style in which the interviewer acts as a “facilitator who enables the interviewee to reexperience and reflect on events” (p.”
The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do (2010, background): “…subject to the traditional criteria of validity, reliability and generalizability in that the validity of autoethnographic research “relates to how well the writing will „evoke in readers a feeling that the experience described is lifelike, believable, and possible” (Ellis & Bochner, 2000, p. 751).”
Bridging the Pipeline: Increasing Underrepresented Students’ Preparation for College Through a Summer Bridge Program (2011, unknown): “…(Creswell, 2003) to obtain pretest and posttest survey data from a sample of college students and then follow up with willing individuals to probe or explore statistical findings in more detail using in-depth interviews (Kvale, 1996) and personal narratives (Bruner, 2004; Ellis & Bochner, 2000).”
Validity in qualitative research revisited (2006, background): “(Ellis and Bochner, 2000: 739) Autoethnography focuses specifically on reflexivity and self consciousness.”
Sporting embodiment: sports studies and the (continuing) promise of phenomenology (2009, background): “…genres fuse author/researcher/ researched, with the purpose of using the researcher’s personal lived experience to illuminate the phenomenon under study (Ellis and Bochner 2000), to invite readers into the text, to relive the experience rather than merely analyse it – at least at a certain level.”
Entrepreneurial Behavior: Firm Organizing Processes (2010, background): “For example, Gartner and Starr (1993) identified 24 different lists of entrepreneurial activities taken from various scholarly books and articles when they attempted to generate a comprehensive list of entrepreneurial behaviors and sequences of entrepreneurial behaviors.”
Running the routes together: co-running and knowledge in action (2008, background): “…remains open to debate, and a whole panoply of terms and different interpretations of the approach co-exists, for example, self-narratives, récits de soi/moi, personal narratives, ethnographic autobiography (Wolcott 2004), to name but a few (see Ellis and Bochner 2000, 739 for a detailed listing).”