Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review

By J. Guzmán, R. Esmail, K. Karjalainen, A. Malmivaara, E. Irvin, C. Bombardier. British medical journal, 2001

1,016 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba041aed7db4940a2e1eff9f2f8de5f17091af76

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

1. R. Chou

In Pathology and Forensic Medicine

1. Geert Crombez
2. M. Leeuw
3. K. Boersma
4. M. Goossens
5. J. Vlaeyen
6. M. V. van Tulder
7. R. Chou
8. R. Ostelo

In Pharmacology

1. Geert Crombez
2. J. Vlaeyen
3. S. Linton
4. M. Leeuw
5. K. Boersma
6. M. Goossens
7. M. V. van Tulder
8. R. Chou

Citations in the corpus

• The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific Evidence (2006, background): “tion in activities, have currently been developed (Guzman et al., 2001; Morley et al., 1999; van Tulder et al., 2000).”
• Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain (2009, neutral): “the best method for providing multimodality therapy for the highly disabled CNCP patient.(36,53,64) The intensity and content of interdisciplinary therapy varies widely, but most involve an exercise program and some type of psychological therapy.”
• A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain (2010, methodology): “Finally, the multidisciplinary treatment included multidisciplinary bio-psychosocial rehabilitation with minimally one physical dimension and one of the other dimensions (psychological or social or occupational) [12].”
• Interventional Therapies, Surgery, and Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society (2009, background): “Although the composition of interdisciplinary rehabilitation programs varies, the most effective programs generally involve cognitive/behavioral and supervised exercise components with at least several sessions a week, with over 100 total hours of treatment.(35,36) Barriers to use of intensive inter”
• Workplace-Based Return-to-Work Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Quantitative Literature (2005, methodology): “9The following types of interventions were excluded from primary studies but included in systematic reviews, as there have been previous systematic reviews focusing on the effectiveness of these interventions and they are not primarily implemented in the workplace: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (”
• Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003, neutral): “Examples are:”
• Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration (2003, background): “In particular, the duration longer than 100 hours, as suggested by a recent systematic review of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for CLBP, versus content, should be addressed.(55)”