Simultaneous use of mark-recapture and radiotelemetry to estimate survival, movement, and capture rates

By L. Powell, M. Conroy, J. Hines, James D. Nichols, D. Krementz. 2000

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9db47ef53d157ee15f20bde109efda8b454eadb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis (2010, methodology): “Some joint models have been developed already (Freeman et al. 1992; Burnham 1993; Barker 1997, 1999; Powell et al. 2000, Besbeas et al. 2002, 2003) and others have been proposed (e.g., Bennetts et al. 2001; Nichols and Hines 2002).”
A review of survival estimates for raptors and owls (2016, methodology): “Consequently, statistical models have been developed to use both live encounter and radiotracking data to estimate true survival (Powell et al. 2000, Nasution et al. 2004).”
SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS (2004, methodology): “Models were constructed using program MSSURVIVRT (Powell et al. 2000) in collaboration with J. D. Nichols and J. E. Hines (U.S. Biological Survey, Patuxtent Wildlife Research Center, Maryland, USA).”
Recent advances in understanding migration systems of New World land birds (2010, background): “These measures include estimates of 0.19 for Hooded Warbler (Wilsonia citrina) four weeks post-fledging in northwestern Pennsylvania, 0.39 for eight weeks postfledging in a population of Yellow-breasted Chat (Icteria virens) in Indiana (Maxted 2001), and 0.75 for 14 weeks post-fledging in a populati”
Estimating true instead of apparent survival using spatial Cormack–Jolly–Seber models (2014, background): “The most promising ones are those where the capture–recapture data are analysed jointly with data that allow the estimation of true survival, such as band-recovery data (Burnham 1993), observations of marked individuals outside the study area (Barker 1997) or telemetry data (Powell et al. 2000).”
LINKING DEMOGRAPHIC EFFECTS OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION ACROSS LANDSCAPES TO CONTINENTAL SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS (2005, methodology): “We used 58% for adult survival for Wood Thrushes, based on results for after-secondyear female Wood Thrushes in Delaware (Roth and Johnson 1993, Brown and Roth 2002), and the same estimate for Wood Thrushes in Georgia, based on a combined mark–recapture and radiotelemetry study (Powell et al. 2000).”
Closure violation in DNA-based mark-recapture estimation of grizzly bear populations (2001, background): “For this, a “grid-based estimate” of the average number of animals on the grid is needed, and this is most readily gained by using radio-collared bears to index movements in and out of the grid area (Kenward et al. 1981; Garshelis 1992; White 1996; Powell et al. 2000).”
Approaches for the direct estimation of u , and demographic contributions to u , using capture-recapture data (2002, methodology): “It is also becoming more common to combine radio-telemetry on a subsample of birds with traditional capture- recapture (e.g. Powell et al., 2000).”
Estimation of survival rates for wader populations: a review of mark-recapture methods (2003, background): “Powell et al. (2000) described a multistate model that combines live encounter data with known fate data from radio telemetry to estimate the probabilities of apparent survival (φ), movement off the study site (ψ) and capture (p).”