Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis
By Steven C. Amstrup, T. Mcdonald, Bryan F. J. Manly. 2010
393 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3b379f2d7770225d85c4074dd9086d2e8abe8986
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jon E. Swenson
- P. Taberlet
- E. Bellemain
- J. Kindberg
- G. Ericsson
- C. Miquel
- Henrik Brøseth
- Olivier Gimenez
In Statistics and Probability
- Henrik Brøseth
- G. Ericsson
- Elena Filatova
- Djellel Eddine Difallah
- Jon E. Swenson
- Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis
- P. Taberlet
- Olivier Gimenez
Citations in the corpus
- Estimating population size and trends of the Swedish brown bear Ursus arctos population (2011, methodology): “We used closed capture models for estimating population size, as these are better suited for estimating the number of individuals (Amstrup et al. 2005), but bears move across large areas and therefore some bears can appear in several counties, violating closure assumptions (Miller et al. 1997,…”
- Wildlife in a Politically Divided World: Insularism Inflates Estimates of Brown Bear Abundance (2016, background): “Capture-recapture (CR) models, a mainstay in wildlife research for nearly half a century (Amstrup et al. 2005), estimate detection probability and account for it when producing estimates of ecological parameters of interest, such as abundance (Williams et al. 2002).”
- Demographics and Dynamics of Mechanical Turk Workers (2018, background): “This bias is a typical issue for the ecology capture-recapture models that ignore the population heterogeneity [1, 28] resulting in population size underestimation.”