SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS

By John Boulanger, Bruce N. McLellan, J. G. Woods, M. Proctor, C. Strobeck. 2004

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/edc6874def466acc73c1613322f4ce2bff7ff5ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Gender-specific dispersal distances of grizzly bears estimated by genetic analysis (2004, background): “Some samples came from previous DNA-based population surveys (Gibeau and Herrero 1997; Woods et al. 1999; Mowat and Strobeck 2000; Boulanger 2001; Boulanger et al. 2004).”
Empirical comparison of density estimators for large carnivores (2010, methodology): “Large carnivores are difficult to enumerate because they range widely, occur at low densities, exhibit heterogeneous capture probabilities, and are often secretive or elusive (Garshelis 1992; Karanth 1995; Boulanger et al. 2004).”
Evaluating the potential biases in carnivore capture–recapture studies associated with the use of lure and varying density estimation techniques using photographic-sampling data of the Malagasy civet (2011, methodology): “The SECR models incorporate the very real likelihood that the sampling layout has an effect on the detection process and area estimation (Boulanger et al. 2004b; Dillon and Kelly 2007).”
Wolf survival and population trend using non-invasive capture-recapture techniques in the Western Alps (2009, background): “Journal compilation 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 1003–1010 time (Schwartz, Luikart & Waples 2007) for a variety of species and locations (e.g. Boulanger et al. 2004).”
SOURCES OF HETEROGENEITY BIAS WHEN DNA MARK-RECAPTURE SAMPLING METHODS ARE APPLIED TO GRIZZLY BEAR (URSUS ARCTOS) POPULATIONS (2004, background): “A meta-analysis of grizzly bear DNA mark-recapture projects in British Columbia.”
Ecological investigations of grizzly bears in Canada using DNA from hair, 1995–2005: a review of methods and progress (2010, methodology): “For instance, when bears concentrated along salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) streams, we placed sampling stations linearly along stream banks (Boulanger et al. 2004a).”
Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods (2009, background): “Passive DNA sampling (e.g. Woods et al. 1999; Mills et al. 2000; Boulanger and McLellan 2001; Boulanger et al. 2004) and camera traps (e.”
Estimating abundance of the remnant Apennine brown bear population using multiple noninvasive genetic data sources (2015, background): “Noninvasive genetic sampling (Schwartz et al. 2007) is increasingly being integrated into mark–recapture frameworks to estimate the abundance of carnivore populations (e.g., Boulanger et al. 2004; Mulders et al. 2007; Mondol et al. 2009; Ruell et al. 2009).”