The creativity quotient: An objective scoring of ideational fluency

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Malevolent Creativity: Does Personality Influence Malicious Divergent Thinking? (2011, methodology): “Although similar scoring techniques have been employed (eg, Cropley, 1967 , Snyder, Mitchell, Bossomaier, & Pallier, 2004 ) we applied this technique approach in a new domain of malevolent creativity.”
Creativity and Intelligence Revisited: A Latent Variable Analysis of Wallach and Kogan (1965) (2008, background): “Runco & Albert, 1985 ; Snyder, Mitchell, Bossomaier, & Pallier, 2004 ), so fluency and originality will be substantially related due to the scoring method.”
Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential (2012, methodology): “Snyder et al. (2004) employed a logarithmic function to create a single score, but they combined fluency and flexibility indices rather than originality.”
The Incubation Effect: Hatching a Solution? (2009, background): “The authors are presently validating a measure designed to (quantitatively) reflect novelty of responses, termed the Creativity Quotient (CQ; Snyder, Mitchell, Bossomaier, & Pallier, 2004b ), which marries flexibility and originality in an encompassing metric.”
Technology-based assessment of creativity in educational context: the case of divergent thinking and its relation to mathematical achievement (2015, background): “Due to the debate others suggested alternative scoring ethods for divergent thinking tests (Plucker, Qian, & Wang, 2011; Snyder et al., 2004).”