Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates.
By L. Börger, Novella Franconi, G. De Michele, Alberto G. Gantz, Fiora Meschi, Andrea Manica, S. Lovari, T. Coulson. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2006
784 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b978fed5e9c87882794fee09df5d35e1aeebb5e9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Hormones, parasites and male mating tactics in Alpine chamois: identifying the mechanisms of life history trade-offs (2012, background): “With large sample sizes the 90% density threshold is recommended (Börger et al. 2006), provided an appropriate bandwidth (i.”
- Spatial structure of Amur (Siberian) tigers (Panthera tigris altaica) on Sikhote-Alin Biosphere Zapovednik, Russia (2010, background): “Most pertinent to this study is that parametric fixed kernel home-range estimates are highly influenced by outliers (Borger et al. 2006) and can overestimate home-range boundaries because they exceed the actual data by a value of h (the kernel radius—Getz et al. 2007).”
- Anti-predator behaviour, space use and habitat selection in female roe deer during the fawning season in a wolf area (2008, methodology): “Following Borger et al. (2006), we defined home-range sizes using 90 and 50% of the available locations.”
- Spatial scales of marine conservation management for breeding seabirds (2018, methodology): “Quantifying the travel distance and size of exploited area First, unrealistic locations were removed based on a species-specific speed filter [50] and PTT data were linearly interpolated to a regular 1 h interval to reduce differences between GPS and PTT data due to their different temporal sampling”
- BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles (2010, methodology): “A 90% utilization distribution was used to estimate the total home range area used by turtles (Borger et al., 2006), while a 50% utilization distribution was used to establish the core area (Worton, 1989; Borger et al.”
- Land sharing is essential for snow leopard conservation (2016, background): “While Kernel is considered more accurate than MCP (Börger et al., 2006), both have been criticized for including areas that are not used by the animals (Getz and Wilmers, 2004; Getz et al., 2007).”
- Evidence-based marine protected area planning for a highly mobile endangered marine vertebrate (2013, methodology): “However, the effectiveness of existing legislation at safeguarding this breeding population has not been addressed, because these studies were (1) biased towards one sex, (2) of limited duration, and (3) based on small sample sizes (<20 individuals) and small volumes of data that might not be repres”
- Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area (2013, methodology): “Ninety percent isopleths were used for home range estimation as it was recently demonstrated that using isopleths greater than 90% can result in unreliable area estimates biased by sample size and sensitive to outliers (Börger et al. 2006).”
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) modify grouping and vocal behaviour in response to location-specific risk (2007, neutral): “size (Börger et al., 2006).”
- What Is the Proper Methodto Delineate Home Range of anAnimal Using Today’s AdvancedGPS Telemetry Systems: The Initial Step (2011, positive): “While some authors have suggested using ≤90% home range contours (Borger et al., 2006; Getz et al., 2007) to remove outliers or exploratory movements for KDE, increasing size of home range from 95% to 99% for BBMM does not over-smooth the utilization distribution but rather serves to more accurately”