Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: primeval forest and metropolitan area

By Tomasz Podgórski, Grzegorz Baś, B. Jędrzejewska, L. Sönnichsen, Stanisław Śnieżko, W. Jędrzejewski, H. Okarma. 2013

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a1c78ea83eeba864a6c5b03fad604e8dcb311dcc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Tomasz Podgórski
2. S. Kramer‐Schadt
3. A. Frantz
4. O. Keuling

In Small Animals

1. Tomasz Podgórski
2. O. Keuling

Citations in the corpus

• Do cities represent sources, sinks or isolated islands for urban wild boar population structure? (2017, background): “2015) has led to an increase in the permanent presence of the large ungulate in and around builtup areas (Cahill et al. 2012; Podgorski et al. 2013).”
• Towards understanding wild boar Sus scrofa movement: a synthetic movement ecology approach (2014, background): “Wild boar are highly adaptable and can quickly change their movement behaviour in response to environmental conditions (Podgórski et al. 2013), giving them the ability to adjust foraging behaviour and balance their energetic yields.”