BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH: Fidelity to foraging sites, consistency of migration routes and habitat modulation of home range by sea turtles

By G. Schofield, Victoria J. Hobson, Sabrina Fossette, M. Lilley, K. A. Katselidis, G. Hays. 2010

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b2eea64451be765499cd7dc53c277c04294a82d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Hays
2. G. Schofield
3. P. Casale
4. M. Hamann
5. P. Luschi
6. Bj Godley
7. K. A. Katselidis
8. A. D. Mazaris

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. G. Hays
2. G. Schofield
3. P. Luschi
4. P. Casale
5. Bj Godley
6. K. A. Katselidis
7. M. Hamann
8. M. Lilley

Citations in the corpus

• Different male vs. female breeding periodicity helps mitigate offspring sex ratio skews in sea turtles (2014, background): “This phenomenon has been noted before for this site (Schofield et al., 2010), and may be beneficial to males as it maximizes their chances of intercepting and mating with females upon their arrival to breed and, hence, allows males to father more offspring.”
• The accuracy of Fastloc‐GPS locations and implications for animal tracking (2014, background): “These taxa include pinnipeds (Costa et al. 2010; Vincent et al. 2010), fish (Sims et al. 2009; Evans et al. 2011), turtles (Hazel 2009; Schofield et al. 2010; © 2014 The Authors.”
• Movement patterns of marine turtles in the Mediterranean Sea: a review (2014, background): “…females (Figure 1), as they (i) remained in the waters close to the nesting site during the breeding period, which, however, lasted a few days only (Schofield et al. 2010b, 2010c); (ii) mostly migrated away from Zakynthos towards disparate feeding grounds predominantly located in the Adriatic or…”
• Oceanic dispersal of juvenile leatherback turtles: going beyond passive drift modeling (2012, result): “It is also consistent with the foraging ground fidelity observed in various sea turtle populations (Limpus et al. 1992, Broderick et al. 2007, Schofield et al. 2010), including leatherbacks (James et al. 2005, Fossette et al. 2010b, Benson et al. 2011).”
• Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps (2012, background): “…et al. 2011, Witt et al. 2011), as well as fidelity to foraging grounds over the course of years (e.g. Limpus et al. 1992, Limpus & Limpus 2001, Schofield et al. 2010, Shillinger et al. 2011), and fine-scale movements that can span national and international jurisdictions (Eckert 2002, Witt et…”
• Revisiting the ontogenetic shift paradigm: The case of juvenile green turtles in the SW Atlantic (2012, background): “Large foraging areas were also recorded for adult loggerheads from the NW Atlantic and the Mediterranean (Cardona et al., 2005; Hawkes et al., 2011; Revelles et al., 2007; Schofield et al., 2010).”
• Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species (2013, methodology): “Table S1 lists the tracking devices used, with information on device programming, performance Diversity and Distributions, 19, 834–844, ª 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 835 metrics and weights being available in our previous publications (e.g. Schofield et al., 2010a).”