Deviations in the emergence of representations: a neuroconstructivist framework for analysing developmental disorders

By A. Oliver, Mark H. Johnson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith, Bruce F. Pennington. 2000

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. German Ignacio Parisi
2. Christopher Kanan
3. Stefan Wermter
4. Tyler L. Hayes
5. Yuko Munakata
6. Ronald Kemker
7. James L. McClelland
8. Michael S. C. Thomas

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. German Ignacio Parisi
2. Stefan Wermter
3. Christopher Kanan
4. Michael S. C. Thomas
5. Yuko Munakata
6. Fiona M. Richardson
7. Stephen Stich
8. Peter Carruthers

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Michael S. C. Thomas
2. Fiona M. Richardson
3. James L. McClelland
4. Stefan Wermter
5. German Ignacio Parisi
6. Christopher Kanan
7. Ronald Kemker

Citations in the corpus

• Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Review (2018, methodology): “upervised self-organizing architectures, it has been proposed to assess the quality of the topological maps in terms of neural activity, discrimination, and organization (Richardson and Thomas, 2008; Oliver et al., 2000). Conversely, supervised methods generally compare the overall classification per”
• Critical periods and catastrophic interference effects in the development of self-organizing feature maps. (2008, methodology): “…typically qualitative in nature (e.g. catastrophic interference effects: French & Chater, 2002; McCloskey & Cohen, 1989; Ratcliff, 1990; Robins, 1995; Robins & McCallum, 1998; Sharkey & Sharkey, 1995; critical period effects: McClelland et al., 1999; Oliver et al., 2000; O’Reilly & Johnson, 1994).”
• Connectionist models of development (2003, background): “First, disorders can emerge through small changes in low-level properties of a system's start state, which interact with processes of development (Oliver et al., 2000).”
• The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents (2005, background): “…acquired and developmental disorders are as fundamental as the differences between static and dynamic neurological and neurocognitive systems (Oliver et al., 2000), leading some to question whether evidence from children or adults with neurodevelopmental disorders can be used to make claims…”
• Past tense formation in Williams syndrome (2001, methodology): “…1996; Karmiloff-Smith, 1998) views developmental disorders in terms of different developmental trajectories, caused by initial differences at a neurocomputational level (see also Karmiloff-Smith & Thomas, in press; Mareschal & Thomas, in press; Oliver et al., 2000; Thomas & Karmiloff-Smith, 2000).”