Determinants of emissions growth in OECD countries

By C. Hamilton, H. Turton. 2002

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b92015471543d8058458449b5e6145b7cef356ee

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity (2020, background): “Since then, there have been great numbers of empirical studies finding the evidences for the inverted U-shaped relationship between economic development and environmental degradation (e.g. Hamilton and Turton 2002; Tsurumi and Managi 2010).”
Economic Complexity and Environmental Performance: Evidence from a World Sample (2019, background): “Here, the environmental performance of country i in period t (EPIi,t) depends on a country’s economic complexity (ECIi,t), which is the key regressor of our analysis, as well as the level of economic development in per capita terms, log(GDP )i,t (taking also into account the Environmental Kuznets Cu”
Social Capital and National Environmental Performance: A Cross-Sectional Analysis (2004, background): “For instance, Hamilton and Turton (2002) found in a decomposition of the factors that explain carbon emissions in OECD countries that income per capita accounted for more than a third of the increase during the period of 1982 to 1997.”
The Impact of Urbanization on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Developing Countries (2008, unknown): “Hamilton and Turton (2002) concluded that income per capita and population growth are the two main factors increasing carbon emissions in OECD countries, whereas the decrease in energy intensity is the main factor reducing them.”
Integrating sustainable chain management with triple bottom line accounting (2005, background): “This view is based on the philosophy that final consumption of goods and services, or in other words, the fulfillment of the wants and needs of the end user, is the driving force responsible for most economic, social, and environmental impacts (Hamilton and Turton, 2001; Mélanie et al., 1994).”
A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan (2006, background): “First of all, a number of national time series studies confirm that per-capita income growth, or lifestyle is the strongest driving factor for energy consumption and CO2 emissions [10,120–123].”
The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (2004, methodology): “Hamilton and Turton (2002) find that the main factor increasing carbon emissions in the OECD from 1982 to 1997 is income per capita (37”
Does financial instability increase environmental degradation? Fresh evidence from Pakistan (2013, background): “These results support the view by Hamilton and Turton (2002) for OECD countries, Friedl and Getzner (2003) for Austria, Ang (2007) for France, Ang (2008) for Malaysia, Say and Yucel (2006) and Halicioglu (2009) for Turkey, and Liu (2005) and Jalil and Mahmud (2009) for China.”