A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan

By Manfred Lenzen, Mette Wier, Claude Cohen, Hitoshi Hayami, S. Pachauri, Robert Schaeffer. 2006

498 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f34e75e8c87432f3f687a573a24bfdc3a35e0e91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Richard Wood
2. Edgar G. Hertwich
3. Manfred Lenzen
4. G. P. Peters
5. T. Wiedmann
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. Arnold Tukker
8. Daniel Moran

In Pollution

1. J. Steinberger
2. Edgar G. Hertwich
3. Klaus Hubacek
4. J. Minx
5. G. Baiocchi
6. M. Büchs
7. Dominik Wiedenhofer
8. Henri Moll

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Edgar G. Hertwich
2. Richard Wood
3. G. P. Peters
4. T. Wiedmann
5. Manfred Lenzen
6. Klaus Hubacek
7. J. Minx
8. Arnold Tukker

Citations in the corpus

• Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption (2016, background): “Email: diana.n.ivanova@ntnu.no © 2015 by Yale University DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12371 Editor managing review: Kuishuang Feng Volume 20, Number 3 are consumed (Lenzen et al. 2006; Hertwich 2011; Tukker and Jansen 2006).”
• Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales (2010, background): “The dominant factor increasing the carbon footprint is household expenditure [22].”
• The Carbon Footprint of Norwegian Household Consumption 1999–2012 (2016, methodology): “CFs can be calculated using various assessment frameworks that account for indirect emissions.”
• The Importance of Imports for Household Environmental Impacts (2006, unknown): “Many studies have used consumer expenditure data to compare HEI across different socio- economic classifications (Herendeen and Tanaka 1976; Herendeen 1978; Vringer and Blok 1995; Wier et al. 2001; Lenzen et al. 2004a, 2006).”
• Would shorter working time reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An analysis of time use and consumption in Swedish households (2015, background): “The resulting elasticities as well as the overall fit of the model are similar to findings from previous studies on household consumption in other countries (Kerkhof et al, 2009; Lenzen et al, 2006; Roca and Serrano, 2007).”
• More or Better? A Model for Changes in Household Greenhouse Gas Emissions due to Higher Income (2010, background): “In the literature, several studies have found a high correlation between household income and energy requirement or carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (Vringer and Blok 1995; Pachauri and Spreng 2002; Reinders et al. 2003; Bin and Dowlatabadi 2005; Cohen et al. 2005; Lenzen et al. 2006).”
• Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households' home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions (2013, methodology): “, 2001: 267), several multivariate studies found that characteristics such as employment status, education, rural/urban location, household composition and age remained to be associated with emissions once income and household size were controlled for (Baiocchi et al., 2010; DEFRA, 2008; Gough et al”
• What if consumers decided to all 'go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions (2013, unknown): “Yet LCA data of embodied GHG emissions suggests that the opposite might be true due to the decrease in GHG intensity of luxury goods (Lenzen et al., 2004, 2006; Hertwich, 2005).”
• Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese urban households (2012, unknown): “Lenzen et al. (2006) analyze the impact of education on household energy requirement in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan, with results that vary across countries, suggesting that the relationship between education and energy requirements is not clear cut. time period that retirees spend…”