Peer Effects in Academic Cheating

By S. Carrell, Frederick V. Malmstrom, J. E. West. The Journal of human resources, 2012

238 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b90c05c2fa3b1aa6979adb0b6eeaa4556ffb0888

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Bruce I. Sacerdote

In Safety Research

1. Y. Kramer
2. Jaume Sureda-Negre
3. Rubén Comas-Forgas
4. David Pascual-Ezama
5. Bruce I. Sacerdote
6. Catrine Jacobsen
7. Toke Reinholt Fosgaard
8. David A. Rettinger

Citations in the corpus

• Why Do We Lie? A Practical Guide To The Dishonesty Literature (2018, background): “Carrell et al. (2008) modelled how the addition of one cheater to a group ‘creates’ roughly three new cheaters.”
• Academic Plagiarism: Explanatory Factors from Students’ Perspective (2010, background): “Carrell et al. (2008) studied the effect of group pressure on academic integrity among students at American military schools.”
• Situational and Personal Causes of Student Cheating (2009, background): “Using self-report data from the past 50 years, Carrell et al. (2005) determined that—controlling for other factors including previous cheating behavior—having more peers who cheated in college is correlated with an individual’s cheating behavior.”
• Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far? (2011, background): “Carrell, Malmstrom, and West (2008) examine peer effects in academic cheating at West Point.”