Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding
By Endrit Kromidha, P. Robson. 2016
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c2541d73961d641766b5abed243e52d77f5e3dc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- F. Polzin
- Wanxiang Cai
- E. Stam
- Tobias Regner
- Paolo Crosetto
- E. Malecki
- Andrew H. Van de Ven
- Ron A. Boschma
In Management Information Systems
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Which updates during an equity crowdfunding campaign increase crowd participation? (2016, unknown): “Furthermore, posting an update has typically no immediate effect on crowd participation because investors’ need some time to learn about the update and to pledge their money (Wheat et al. 2013; Mollick 2014; Kromidha and Robson 2016; Vismara 2016b).”
- It's never too late: Funding dynamics and self pledges in reward-based crowdfunding (2018, result): “Moreover, we find only partial evidence in line with a goal proximity effect as proposed by Kuppuswamy and Bayus [2017]. While our data support a correlation between added pledgers and a project’s proximity to its funding goal (their specification), we do not find an effect of goal proximity using t”
- Crowdfunding and social capital: A systematic review using a dynamic perspective (2021, background): “Other studies use Facebook shares to represent identity toward the project (Kromidha and Robson, 2016) and social networks in general (Lagazio and Querci, 2018).”