Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk–needs–responsivity approach

By J. Ogloff, M. Davis. 2004

188 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a90c6af93863c0e96dd3f73daf9dad278c09dbe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Bonta
2. Jan Looman
3. J. Abracen
4. S. Wormith
5. Demetra Andrews
6. A. Day
7. F. Cullen
8. K. Howells

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Bonta
2. S. Wormith
3. Demetra Andrews
4. Jan Looman
5. J. Abracen
6. A. Day
7. F. Cullen
8. Kelly Hannah-Moffat

Citations in the corpus

• Readiness for treatment in high risk offenders with personality disorders (2007, background): “Whilst the Risk and Needs principles have been widely adopted in the criminal justice system (Andrews & Bonta, 2003 ), the Responsivity principle has suffered some neglect (Howells, Day, & Davey, 2005 ; Ogloff & Davis, 2004 ).”
• Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” Proposition (2013, background): “self-esteem, motivation, personality traits, life circumstances, and therapeutic relationships) that may facilitate or impede an individual’s response to intervention (Ogloff & Davis, 2004 , p.”
• Reconstructing the Risk-Need-Responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation (2007, unknown): “First, in their exposition of the RNR model, Ogloff and Davis (2004) proposed that the Psychology of Criminal Conduct (PCC) perspective outlined by Andrews and Bonta (2003) in a number of publications “provides directions for the assessment of offenders and their classification for treatment” (p.…”
• The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model (2011, background): “For the most part, we have left it to others to weigh the relative merits of RNR and GLM (e.g., Cullen, in press; Glaser, 2010; Ogloff & Davis, 2004).”
• The Risk Need Responsivity Model of Offender Rehabilitation: Is There Really a Need for a Paradigm Shift?. (2013, background): “Substance abuse Thus, the RNR Model considers personal, interpersonal, and social factors as being involved in the acquisition and maintenance of criminal behavior (Ogloff & Davis, 2004).”
• Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. (2010, background): “As in the United States, the increase in punishment is not a reflection of increased crime in the community at large.”
• Rehabilitation: Beyond Nothing Works (2013, background): “It is clear that the Canadians’ paradigm is now the “dominant model” in offender rehabilitation (Polaschek 2012; see also Ogloff and Davis 2004).”