European Red List of Butterflies

By C. V. van Swaay, Annabelle Cuttelod, S. Collins, Dirk Maes, M. Munguira, M. Šašić, Josef Settele, R. Verovnik, T. Verstrael, M. Warren and 2 more. 2010

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b87189a3f5db3d13a8b1a0d1b5962960d3decc9f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Pedro Cardoso
2. P. Borges
3. Nigel Maxted
4. Annabelle Cuttelod
5. R. Lansdown
6. T. Erwin
7. J. Freyhof
8. E. Brooks

Citations in the corpus

• The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them (2011, background): “There are also many regional studies already published (e.g. butterflies and dragonflies in Europe) (Kalkman et al., 2010; Van Swaay et al., 2010, 2011).”
• European Red List of vascular plants (2011, background): “…13% of birds, and 9% of butterflies are threatened, groups that have been comprehensively assessed in Europe (Cuttelod et al. 2011, Freyhof and Brooks 2011, Temple and Cox 2009, Cox and Temple 2009, Temple and Terry 2007, Kalkman et al. 2010, BirdLife International 2004a, van Swaay et al. 2010).”
• Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates (2011, methodology): “Such monitoring has been restricted mainly to butterflies (van Swaay et al., 2008; Lewis and Senior, 2011), allowing the publication of red lists (van Swaay et al., 2010, 2011; Fox et al., in press) and the selection of priority areas for conservation (van Swaay and Warren, 2006).”
• Asymmetrical responses of forest and “beyond edge” arthropod communities across a forest–grassland ecotone (2014, unknown): “In contrast, European butterflies are mainly associated with open habitats (Van Swaay et al. 2006) and are negatively affected by forest presence (Ricketts 2001).”
• European Red List of freshwater fishes (2011, background): “…of reptiles, 15% of mammals and dragonflies, 13% of birds, 9% of butterflies and 7% of the aquatic plants are threatened at the European level (BirdLife International 2004a, Temple and Terry 2007, Cox and Temple 2009, Nieto and Alexander 2010, Kalkman et al. 2010, van Swaay et al. 2010, Bilz et al.”
• Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers (2019, background): “A more recent assessment of 435 butterflies native to Europe (van Swaay et al., 2010) found that populations of 19% of species are declining, particularly in Mediterranean and eastern countries, 8.5% species are threatened, and three are critically-endangered, i.e. Pieris brassicae wollastoni,…”
• European Red List of non-marine molluscs (2011, background): “…and 7% of aquatic plants are threatened, the other groups that have been comprehensively assessed in Europe (Freyhof and Brooks 2011, Temple and Cox 2009, Cox and Temple 2009, Temple and Terry 2007, Kalkman et al. 2010, BirdLife International 2004a, van Swaay et al. 2010, Bilz et al. 2011).”
• The use of opportunistic data for IUCN Red List assessments (2015, unknown): “Europe (ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/) Amphibians (Temple & Cox, 2009); Butterflies (van Swaay et al., 2010); Dragonflies (Kalkman et al., 2010); Freshwater fishes ( Freyhof & Brooks, 2011); Freshwater molluscs (Cuttelod, Seddon & Neubert, 2011); Mammals (Temple &…”