The use of opportunistic data for IUCN Red List assessments

By Dirk Maes, Nick J B Isaac, C. Harrower, B. Collen, A. Strien, David Roy. 2015

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/02917b2f49d38fad2c0c1e732d3de4a68170725f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Chris D. Preston
2. Michael J. O. Pocock
3. Helen E. Roy
4. David Roy
5. Gianluigi Bacchetta
6. R. Fox
7. Christopher M Thomas
8. J. Brommer

In Ecology

1. Michael J. O. Pocock
2. Helen E. Roy
3. David Roy
4. Chris D. Preston

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Chris D. Preston
2. Michael J. O. Pocock
3. Helen E. Roy
4. F. Prosser
5. Gianluigi Bacchetta
6. David Roy
7. R. Fox
8. Christopher M Thomas

Citations in the corpus

• The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science (2015, methodology): “These records therefore have direct practical application, e.g. in assessing the status of species (Burns et al., 2013; Maes et al., 2015; Powney & Isaac, 2015) and habitats (Gillingham et al., 2015a; Thomas & Gillingham, 2015b), and contributing to UK government biodiversity indicators (Department…”
• Red list of threatened vascular plants in Italy (2020, background): “The IUCN Red Lists of Threatened Species are widely recognised as the most authoritative information source on the extinction risk of species, because they use a standardised set of quantitative criteria for assessing species conservation status and threats (Maes et al. 2015; Collen et al. 2016).”