Adapting the IUCN Red List criteria for invertebrates

By Pedro Cardoso, P. Borges, K. A. Triantis, M. Ferrández, José Luis Martín. 2011

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7d39d68673d34d324ac88f4ff2cd96e6e421a34b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Nick J B Isaac
2. David Roy
3. A. Strien
4. Dirk Maes
5. S. Bachman
6. Matthew J. Smith
7. A. Córdoba‐Aguilar
8. P. Rodríguez

In Ecology

1. David Roy
2. Nick J B Isaac
3. S. Bachman
4. Matthew J. Smith
5. A. Córdoba‐Aguilar
6. A. Strien
7. C. Harrower
8. P. Rodríguez

In Social Psychology

1. David A. Coomes
2. B. Collen
3. Nick J B Isaac

Citations in the corpus

• Using species distribution models to inform IUCN Red List assessments (2014, methodology): “Recent studies have used SDMs to estimate species ranges and occupied areas for the purposes of informing IUCN Red List assessments (e.g. Cardoso et al. 2011; Jiménez-Alfaro et al. 2012; Papes and Gaubert 2007; Pena et al. 2014; Sergio et al. 2007).”
• Geographical, temporal and taxonomic biases in insect GBIF data on biodiversity and extinction (2021, background): “This erroneous extrapolation is related to what Cardoso and Leather (2019) justifiably referred to as the Linnaean and the Prestonian shortfalls, which respectively means ignoring both how many species there are and the abundance of species and their trends in space and time (Cardoso et al., 2011b).”
• The use of opportunistic data for IUCN Red List assessments (2015, background): “…invertebrates versus long-lived vertebrates), but also because of differences in data availability, some have argued that IUCN criteria should be differentiated for taxonomic groups (e.g., invertebrates – Cardoso et al., 2011; Cardoso et al., 2012) and/or for spatial scales (Brito et al., 2010).”
• Evaluating the conservation status of epiphytic lichens of Italy: A red list (2013, background): “…to fill this gap by providing plausible adaptations of IUCN criteria to the case of overlooked organisms is rapidly increasing (e.g. Hallingbäck et al. 1998; Keller et al. 2005; Cardoso et al. 2011; Dahlberg & Mueller 2011), giving new perspectives for building multitaxon conservation plans.”
• The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? (2022, unknown): “In the search for alternative approaches, some have suggested revising and augmenting the Red List criteria to permit more realistic evaluations of invertebrates or plants (Cardoso et al ., 2011; Bachman et al ., 2019; Fox et al ., 2019).”
• Climate change may drive cave spiders to extinction (2018, background): “From a conservation perspective, the ecological and biogeographical peculiarity of the subterranean fauna enhances the risk of local extinction (Cardoso 2011a, b, 2012) and strengthens the importance of considering subterranean organisms as model species for ecological studies dealing with climatic…”