What are the consequences of consequentiality
By Joseph A. Herriges, Catherine L. Kling, Chih-Chen Liu, J. Tobias. 2009
210 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7f6bca2c7de30ca0446ab3f0ccf4c18312bb087
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- John M. Rose
- N. Hanley
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Mikoaj Czajkowski
- David A. Hensher
- S. B. Olsen
- Michiel C. J. Bliemer
- Emily Lancsar
In General Decision Sciences
- N. Hanley
- John M. Rose
- Riccardo Scarpa
- Mikoaj Czajkowski
- David A. Hensher
- Christian A. Vossler
- Kevin J. Boyle
- Wuyang Hu
Citations in the corpus
- Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice (2014, background): “…(e.g., Polomé 2003; Landry and List 2007; Carson, Chilton, and Hutchinson 2009; Nepal, Berrens, and Bohara 2009; Vossler and Evans 2009; and Herriges et al. 2010; Vossler, Doyon, and Rondeau 2012; Vossler and Watson 2013; Mitani and Flores, forthcoming) and have found substantial empirical…”
- Understanding the consequences of consequentiality: Testing the validity of stated preferences in the field (2012, unknown): “14 There is mixed evidence on whether self-reported measures of consequentiality should be treated as endogenous in a WTP regression: Herriges et al. (2010) find statistical support for this whereas Vossler et al. (2012) do not.”
- Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling (2014, background): “Most of the empirical literature on recycling at the household level2 within environmental economics has focused on the direct cost to households of engaging in recycling effort— such as the availability of curbside pick-up recycling rather than “bring” systems where consumers must transport recycla”
- Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “Consequentiality is one component of incentive-compatible value elicitation, and as such is a necessary but not sufficient condition (Herriges et al. 2010; Vossler et al. 2012; Carson et al. 2014). overs to environmental economics is found in research by Lareau and Rae (1989).”
- Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis (2018, background): “For example, Bulte et al. (2005) found that an ex ante consequentiality script significantly lowered WTP, Interis and Petrolia (2014) found that ex post perceptions of consequentiality affect welfare estimates, and Herriges et al. (2010) implemented both.”
- Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods (2021, methodology): “…a CE aimed at valuation of nonmarket public goods is deemed consequential if respondents care about the presented policy and view their responses as potentially influencing the decision regarding the implementation of the policy (also known as policy consequentiality (Herriges et al., 2010)).”