Comparative Political Economy of Wage Distribution: The Role of Partisanship and Labour Market Institutions

By Jonas Pontusson, David Rueda, Christopher Way. British Journal of Political Science, 2002

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7e301c65eab689f7ed75279908ea9d6c10bd3cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. John Stephens
2. V. Mahler
3. Philipp Heimberger
4. E. Huber
5. John S. Ahlquist
6. A. Johnston
7. Aidan Regan
8. David J. Brady

In Public Administration

1. John Stephens
2. E. Huber
3. John S. Ahlquist
4. V. Mahler
5. Aidan Regan
6. Ola Sjöberg
7. Torben Iversen
8. David J. Brady

Citations in the corpus

• Labor Unions, Political Representation, and Economic Inequality (2017, methodology): “Pontusson et al. (2002) find that unionization’s effects are strongest in the bottom half of the income distribution; Pontusson (2013) updates this conclusion, reporting that the within-country relationship between union density and wage inequality has weakened since the mid-1990s.”
• Housing prices and wealth inequality in Western Europe (2019, background): “Robust debates in CPE have examined how left-wing governments, strong unions and collaborative wage-setting institutions, progressive taxation, a redistributive welfare state and public sector employment impact on income inequality (Bradley et al. 2003; Card et al. 2004; Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005”
• Economic Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Income Inequality in the Developed Countries (2004, methodology): “…the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD; 1993, 1996) Employment Outlook; this is, for example, the ultimate source of the data used in influential recent studies by Wallerstein (1999), Rueda and Pontusson (2000), Moen and Wallerstein (2001), and Pontusson et al. (2002).”
• Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000 (2007, unknown): “…1998; Garrett 1998; and Iversen and Cusack 2000+ 4+ See Beramendi and Cusack 2004; Esping-Andersen 1990; Garrett 1998; Kenworthy and Pontus- son 2005; Pontusson, Rueda, and Way 2002; and Wallerstein 1999+ 5+ See Bradley et al+ 2003; Moene and Wallerstein 2001; Oatley 1999; and Swank 2002+ 6+…”
• Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “Finally, the political science literature has emphasised that it is relevant which parties are part of the government since their ideological leanings may lead to quite different responses to economic globalisation (e.g. Pontusson et al. 2002; Dorn and Schinke 2018).”
• Income inequality and redistribution in post-industrial democracies: demographic, economic and political determinants (2014, background): “Wage dispersion in turn is heavily shaped by a number of factors, such as supply and demand of skills (see below) and a country’s system of labour relations and political power distributions (Wallerstein, 1999; Rueda and Pontusson, 2000; Pontusson et al., 2002).”