Economic Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Income Inequality in the Developed Countries
By V. Mahler. 2004
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/19e5b5f1810f16d61633bcbb6cef5d972fc0d176
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- V. Mahler
- Jason Beckfield
- Philipp Heimberger
- Cecilia García-Peñalosa
- Daniele Checchi
- David J. Brady
- Vicki L. Birchfield
- Michelle L. Dion
In Political Science and International Relations
- Philipp Heimberger
- Jason Beckfield
- David J. Brady
- Cecilia García-Peñalosa
- Daniele Checchi
- Wei Zhao
- Vicki L. Birchfield
- Michelle L. Dion
In Sociology and Political Science
- V. Mahler
- Cecilia García-Peñalosa
- Jason Beckfield
- Philipp Heimberger
- Daniele Checchi
- David J. Brady
- Vicki L. Birchfield
- Michelle L. Dion
Citations in the corpus
- European Integration and Income Inequality (2006, background): “Limitations aside, this paper shows that the recent rise in income inequality within Western European societies, cases of the general increase in income inequality observed across several advanced industrial societies (Alderson and Nielsen 2002; Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005; Mahler 2004), is partly ”
- Does economic globalisation affect income inequality? A meta‐analysis (2020, background): “…et al. (2012) Mah (2013) Wong (2016) Dobson and Ramlogan-Dobson (2010) Mahler et al. (1999) Wu and Hsu (2012) Dobson and Ramlogan-Dobson (2012) Mahler (2004) Xu and Zou (2000) Dollar and Kraay (2002) Majeed (2015) Zakaria and Fida (2016) Dollar and Kraay (2004) Meschi and Vivarelli (2009)…”
- The Consequences of Economic Globalization for Affluent Democracies (2007, background): “For example, Mahler (2004) provides evidence that globalization cannot explain the enormous variation in inequality across affluent democracies, and domestic politics remains crucial.”
- Electoral turnout and income redistribution by the state: A cross-national analysis of the developed democracies (2008, background): “, 2003) have not considered turnout at all, while in nearly all of the others (e.g., Huber and Stephens, 2001; Crepaz, 2002; Mahler, 2004) turnout has been one of many variables in analyses whose main focus was on other factors.”
- Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD (2009, methodology): “…Welfare States Data Set, assembled by Evelyne Huber, Charles Ragin and John D. Stephens (December 1997) and updated by David Brady, Jason Beckfield and John Stephens (April 2004), downloaded from www.lisproject.org on 20 January 2008. r The London School of Economics and Political Science 2009”
- Economic development, income inequality and preferences for redistribution * (2010, background): “…focused on the various political and institutional factors that help explain cross-national variation in levels of income inequality (Birchfield and Crepaz, 1998; Bradley, Huber, Moller, Nielsen, and Stephens 2003; Mahler 2004; Kenworthy and Pontusson 2005; Iversen 2005; Iversen and Soskice 2006).”