Damages and injunctions in protecting intellectual property

By Mark Schankerman, Suzanne Scotchmer. 2001

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7c027c26e00d702db421a0a8fe5a76a9cbfd8b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System? (2002, background): “Consistent with this view, Scotchmer (1999a) justified patents by assuming that the cost and value are both unobservable.”
Litigation and Settlement in Patent Infringement Cases (2002, background): “These are one of the “four key determinants of the likelihood of observing a filed case” (Lanjouw and Schankerman, (1998)).”
Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements (2001, background): “47 In contrast to this case, the DOJ issued 46 See Klein (1997) for a nice discussion of the airplane patent pool.”
Models of knowledge and systems of governance (2005, background): “The duration of exclusive property rights assigned by patents and the conditions for their renewal, become a central issue for the possible negative drawbacks in slowing the rate of generation of new knowledge, especially when general purpose knowledge with a wide scope of applications is concerned ”
The Impact of Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights on the Market for Ideas: Evidence from Patent Grant Delays (2008, background): “While an extensive literature examines the role of uncertainty in patent licensing, and the drivers of patent licensing and patent litigation settlement (e.g., Katz and Shapiro, 1986; Gallini and Winter, 1985; Lanjouw and Lerner, 2001; Schankerman and Scotchmer, 2001), these studies do not explicitl”
On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” (2007, background): “In Section 4.4, we showed that the urrent theory on patent infringement stops short of xplaining the large number of infringement cases. ccording to Schankerman and Scotchmer (2001), atent infringement does not take place in equilibium.”