The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality

By J. Jackson, Lee A. Kirkpatrick. 2007

306 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b7344213f92c7da750c38536a63150bb63c78c2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Sex, Power, and Money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility (2013, methodology): “Jonason and Kavanagh (2010) also found that the Dark Triad variables (especially Psychopathy) were correlated more strongly with the Ludus (i.”
Evolution and human motivation: A fundamental motives framework (2017, background): “Particularly notable is work on sociosexual orientation—individual differences in motivational inclinations toward restricted and unrestricted mating (Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007; Penke & Asendorpf, 2008).”
Sex Differences in Attachment Emerge in Middle Childhood: An Evolutionary Hypothesis (2010, background): “…context of couple relationships—promoting long-term bonding, cooperative parenting, and (ultimately) parental investment (e.g., Del Giudice, 2009a, 2009b; Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007)—one should expect discordance between attachment styles measured at different ages and for different relationships.”
Disgust and mating strategy (2015, methodology): “The SOI-R, the instrument most commonly used to assess mating strategy, is a unidimensional scale that taps short-term mating orientation but does not index desire for, or orientation toward, long-term mating (Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007).”
The Development of Life History Strategies: Toward a Multi-Stage Theory (2010, background): “Finally, humans can enact “mixed” strategies, where parental investment and long-term commitment to one’s partner coexists with the occasional pursuit of short-term matings (see Del Giudice, 2009a ; Gangestad & Simpson, 2000 ; Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007 ; Schmitt, 2005 ).”
The Behavioral Immune System (2015, background): “For example, in the domain of sexual behavior, people differ in their dispositional tendency toward restricted versus unrestricted (e.g., promiscuous) mating strategies (Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007; Simpson & Gangestad, 1991).”
Perceived threat of infectious disease and its implications for sexual attitudes (2013, background): “…long-term and short-term mating styles are relatively stable across time, and can be empirically assessed as trait-like individual differences (Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007; Simpson & Gangestad, 1991), these dispositions can also vary across time and circumstances (Haselton & Gangestad, 2006;…”
The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. (2010, methodology): “Sociosexuality was measured as a tripartite personality construct (Jackson & Kirkpatrick, 2007).”
Big Five Traits Related to Short-Term Mating: From Personality to Promiscuity across 46 Nations (2008, background): “Still others may possess high levels of interest in short-term mating, but are not able or willing to engage in short-term mating (Jackson and Kirkpatrick, 2007; Webster and Bryan, 2007).”