Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics
By N. Smith. 1994
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Vincent Blok
- P. Lemmens
- Heinz K. Klein
- Michael D. Myers
- J. Luttenberg
- T. Bergen
- Donald E. Wynn Jr.
- Steven L. Alter
Citations in the corpus
- Teacher reflection: the development of a typology (2008, background): “Along these lines, Coultner (2001) has borrowed the division of the pragmatic, ethical and moral from Habermas (1991) to divide reflection into distinct domains representing the three most important schools of thought in western practical philosophy, namely: utilitarianism, virtue ethics and moral…”
- The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation (2015, background): “These norms are valid if the participants agree to it as participants of practical discourses (Habermas 1990, 1993).”
- Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason (2017, unknown): “7 See e.g. (Rawls, 1997; Raz, 1998; Hawbermas, 1993).”
- A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “He argues that the validity of a claim to normative rightness depends upon the mutual understanding achieved by individuals in argument (Habermas 1993; Habermas et al. 1992).”