A Set of Principles for Conducting Critical Research in Information Systems

484 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ethical norms and issues in crowdsourcing practices: A Habermasian analysis (2018, unknown): “reflect our critical methodology with its focus on insight, critique and transformation (Alvesson and Deetz 2000; Myers and Klein 2011), respectively.”
Principles for Conducting Critical Realist Case Study Research in Information Systems (2012, methodology): “Thus, all knowledge in CR is value aware and theoretically informed, derived from multiple value-aware perceptions of a single independent reality (Healy and Perry 2000).”
Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, background): “…science, and action research) have been widely available in the IS literature (e.g., Dubé and Paré 2003; Hevner et al. 2004; Klein and Myers 1999; Lee 1989; Mingers 2001; Myers and Klein 2011; Straub et al. 2004), guidelines for conducting and evaluating mixed methods research in IS are lacking.”
Experiences from Sequential Use of Mixed Methods (2011, background): “Understanding how existing business practices impact upon people and communities, or development of new business practices as above that improve upon that impact, is much better supported by the Critical Research (CR) paradigm (Cecez-Kecmanovic et al, 2008; Stahl, 2008b; Myers and Klein, 2011).”