Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition

By E. Leger, K. Rice. 2003

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b62d602d99ce1cb9c5319e21486ed481125af8ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Differences in morphological and physiological traits between native and invasive populations of Sapium sebiferum (2007, background): “Invasive plants often grow more vigorously and attain higher abundances in their introduced range compared to conspecifics in their native range (Elton 1958; Crawley 1987; Thebaud & Simberloff 2001; Leger & Rice 2003; Jakobs, Weber & Edwards 2004; Bossdorf et al. 2005).”
A Comparison of Plastic Responses to Competition by Invasive and Non-invasive Congeners in the Commelinaceae (2006, background): “More recently, Daehler (2003) reviewed studies comparing the plasticity of invasive plant species and native species and concluded that invasive species are generally more plastic and that greater phenotypic plasticity contributes to success as an invader (cf. Leger and Rice 2003).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “Many studies have found at least partial support for the ‘evolution of increased competitive ability’ (EICA) hypothesis which predicts that plants introduced into an environment that lacks their usual herbivores will experience selection favouring individuals that allocate less energy to defence and”
Invasive and native Rhododendron ponticum populations: is there evidence for genotypic differences in germination and growth? (2005, background): “…environments (Callaway and Aschehough 2000), or as adaptation resulting in the evolution of post-invasion genetic differences (Mack et al. 2000, Leger and Rice 2003), possibly as a consequence of the escape from enemies as posited by the EICA hypothesis (Blossey and Nötzold 1995, Maron and…”
RAPID EVOLUTION OF AN INVASIVE PLANT (2004, background): “Leger and Rice (2003) found that introduced California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) from Chile were larger and more fecund than native Californian conspecifics in common gardens, but only in the absence of competition.”
A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range (2005, unknown): “Leger & Rice (2003)”
Biological invasions drive size increases in marine and estuarine invertebrates (2003, background): “…common garden experiments, whose aim was to determine if size changes in invading plants had a genetic basis, but whose conclusions were notably conflicting (Blossey & Nötzold 1995; Willis et al. 2000; Maron & Vila 2001; Siemann & Rogers 2001; Thébaud & Simberloff 2001; Leger & Rice 2003).”
Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. (2009, unknown): “a Wolfe et al. (2004); Stastny et al. (2005); Joshi and Vrieling (2005); Zou et al. (2008a, b). b Leger and Rice (2003) ; Leger and Rice (2007).”
Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis (2004, background): “However, the generality of the latter ‘evolution 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS of increased competitive ability’ (EICA; sensu Blossey & Nötzold 1995) has received conflicting support (Willis et al. 2000; van Kleunen & Schmid 2003 but see Leger & Rice 2003; Siemann & Rogers 2003a).”
Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (2004, background): “There is evidence for EICA (Daehler and Strong 1997; Willis and Blossey 1999; Siemann and Rogers 2001; 2003a,b; Leger and Rice 2003) and against it (Willis et al. 2000; Vilá et al. 2003; van Kleunen and Schmid 2003; Bossdorf et al. 2004; Maron et al. 2004).”
THE EVOLUTION OF AN INVASIVE PLANT: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY WITH SILENE LATIFOLIA (2004, background): “2 Corresponding author; E-mail: wolfe@georgiasouthern.edu sponse to ecological differences in the introduced range, it is possible that an exotic species expresses a genetically based ‘‘invasive’’ phenotype following colonization (Siemann and Rogers 2001, Leger and Rice 2003).”
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. (2006, background): “There are a number of additional studies that tested for differences in plasticity between native and introduced populations without emphasizing this component of their results (e.g. van Kleunen & Schmid 2003; Leger & Rice 2003; Vila et al. 2003; Blair & Wolfe 2004; Bossdorf et al. 2004a).”
The importance of long‐distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation (2005, background): “Most importantly, it determines to a large extent the rate of population spread (Kot et al., 1996; Clark, 1998; Turchin, 1998; Shigesada & Kawasaki, 2002; Levin et al., 2003; Green & Figuerola, 2005).”
Reduced competitive ability in an invasive plant (2004, background): “Leger & Rice (2003) found that invasive populations of Eschscholzia californica were superior only when grown without competition by horticultural poppies.”