RAPID EVOLUTION OF AN INVASIVE PLANT
By J. Maron, M. Vilà, R. Bommarco, S. Elmendorf, P. Beardsley. 2004
697 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09feca9823260498b82aaefeece3f6457c3fa9a0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Wilfried Thuiller
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Jorge M. Lobo
- Antoine Guisan
- Jane Elith
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Jorge Soberón
- Miguel B. Araújo
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- R. Callaway
- Wilfried Thuiller
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Antoine Guisan
- F. Valladares
- P. Alpert
In Genetics
- A. Townsend Peterson
- Jorge Soberón
- Jorge M. Lobo
- A. Jiménez‐Valverde
- Wilfried Thuiller
- E. Siemann
- F. Valladares
- W. E. Rogers
Citations in the corpus
- Microevolution in biological control: Mechanisms, patterns, and processes (2005, background): “There is strong evidence that invasive plants can become locally adapted to their new environment fairly rapidly (e.g., Blair and Wolfe, 2004; Maron et al., 2004; Siemann and Rogers, 2001), suggesting that introduced biological control agents may adapt as well.”
- Niche based distribution modelling of an invasive alien plant: effects of population status, propagule pressure and invasion history (2009, background): “In addition, rapid evolutionary change, which may alter a species’ fundamental niche profoundly, have been repeatedly documented in the course of invasions (e.g. Lee 2002; Maron et al. 2004).”
- Rapid evolution in introduced species, ‘invasive traits’ and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential (2008, background): “TX 77005, USA *Correspondence: Kenneth D. Whitney, Rice University, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 6100 Main St., Houston, TX 77005, USA.”
- ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “…(or the Natural Enemies Hypothesis), which posits that introduced species may enjoy success in novel habitats because they lose their enemies during the invasion process (Elton 1958, Maron and Vilà 2001, Keane and Crawley 2002, Wolfe 2002, Mitchell and Power 2003, Torchin and Mitchell 2004).”
- Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis (2009, background): “However, experimental studies of invasive species in situ in both the native and invaded ranges have rarely been performed ( Maron et al . 2004; Hierro et al . 2006).”
- Plant-soil biota interactions of an invasive species in its native and introduced ranges: implications for invasion success. (2013, background): “Most studies to date have focused on how changes in the aboveground herbivore or pathogen community affect invasive plant populations’ resistance or growth compared to native populations (Siemann and Rogers, 2003; Maron et al., 2004; Zou et al., 2008).”
- Geographical variation in vegetative growth and sexual reproduction of the invasive Spartina alterniflora in China (2016, background): “In some cases, rapid evolutionary responses by the introduced species allow adaptive matching of genotype to environment (Mooney & Cleland 2001; Maron et al. 2004; Prentis et al. *Correspondence author: E-mail: zyh@xmu.edu.cn © 2015 The Authors.”
- Ecological Genetics of Plant Invasion: What Do We Know? (2008, background): “…amount of research has explored the evolution of invasive plants, and has examined whether certain genotypes within an invading population are more successful (e.g., Maron et al. 2004; Siemann and Rogers 2001; van Kleunen and Schmid 2003; Willis et al. 2000; and reviewed by Bossdorf et al. 2005).”
- Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs: A Review of Empirical Data (2017, background): “While EICA has been often mentioned to explain plant invasions (Maron et al., 2004a,b; Vilà et al., 2003), it has rarely been fully validated and therefore its true importance is currently unknown (Gurevitch et al., 2011).”
- NO EVIDENCE FOR TRADE‐OFFS: CENTAUREA PLANTS FROM AMERICA ARE BETTER COMPETITORS AND DEFENDERS (2008, background): “Consequently, our design does not take into account conditionality in the responses of North American and European populations, as demonstrated by Maron et al. (2004) for Hypericum perforatum grown in multiple common gardens in different parts of the world.”
- Novel Weapons: Invasive Success and the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (2004, background): “There is evidence for EICA (Daehler and Strong 1997; Willis and Blossey 1999; Siemann and Rogers 2001; 2003a,b; Leger and Rice 2003) and against it (Willis et al. 2000; Vilá et al. 2003; van Kleunen and Schmid 2003; Bossdorf et al. 2004; Maron et al. 2004).”
- Adaptive geographical clines in the growth and defense of a native plant (2012, background): “…sessile than animals, parallel clines in morphological and life-history traits among native and invasive populations have also led to the conclusion of rapid evolution to climatic conditions in several systems (Maron et al. 2004, Etterson et al. 2008, Montague et al. 2008, Alexander et al. 2009).”
- Identifying the role of soil microbes in plant invasions (2016, background): “Some studies have found evidence for post-introduction evolution of increased competitive ability in response to soil biota in the exotic range (Maron et al. 2004; Ridenour et al. 2008; Barney, Whitlow & DiTommaso 2009).”
- Pathogen accumulation and long‐term dynamics of plant invasions (2013, background): “Research on post-introduction evolution (Maron et al. 2004) and the introduction of biological controls (reviewed by Culliney 2005) suggests that interactions of invasive species with enemies, competitors and mutualists can co-evolve and feedback to affect the dynamics of invasive species over time.”
- Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. (2008, background): “We expected that a high genetic variability would enable a species either to find appropriate sites or adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions (Sakai et al., 2001; Maron et al., 2004).”