Classifying Juvenile Offenders According to Risk of Recidivism

By C. Schwalbe, M. Fraser, Steven Day, Valerie Cooley. 2006

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5c9d88eed1debb21bc3b3a38c4ed26373b86b51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Michael T. Baglivio
2. Katherine Jackowski
3. C. Schwalbe
4. Nathan Epps

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michael T. Baglivio
2. Katherine Jackowski
3. C. Schwalbe
4. Nathan Epps

Citations in the corpus

• A Meta-Analysis of Juvenile Justice Risk Assessment Instruments (2008, methodology): “Although Funk (1999) and Schwalbe et al. (2006) demonstrated that risk factors underlying recidivism risk may vary according to gender, alternative explanations are possible.”
• Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity (2013, result): “These findings are consistent with previous research (Schwalbe et al., 2006).”