Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil
By D. Binkley, Jose-Luiz Stape, W. Bauerle, Michael G. Ryan. 2010
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5bbc80275c9d04a0805595274389fb4f2083b23
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Mapping local density of young Eucalyptus plantations by individual tree detection in high spatial resolution satellite images (2013, background): “Areas of strong mortality or poor growth are generally conserved up to the end of the rotation and result in overall lower productivity (Stape et al., 2010).”
- Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation (2013, background): “8-fold greater stem growth per unit of light absorption (Binkley et al., 2010).”
- Growing Plantation Forests (2010, background): “; Landsberg and Gower 1997, p. 136; Whitehead and Beadle 2004; Stape et al. 2008; Binkley et al. 2010).”
- Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: How water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation (2010, unknown): “(Binkley et al., 2010).”
- Tree diversity enhances tree transpiration in a Panamanian forest plantation (2012, background): “2009), light conditions (Binkley et al. 2010) and silvicultural treatments (Hubbard et al.”
- Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands (2013, background): “The clone treatments included a uniform stand structure with all trees planted in a single day, and a heterogeneous stand structure with the time of planting within a plot staggered over a 90-day period (Boyden et al., 2008; Binkley et al., 2010).”
- Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (2017, background): “…diversity has also been found to have negative effects on productivity, and in some forest types increasing size heterogeneity can reduce productivity by 20% (Binkley et al. 2010; Ryan et al. 2010; Stape et al. 2010; Aspinwall et al. 2011; Luu et al. 2013; Bourdier et al. 2016; Soares et al. 2016).”
- Aboveground carbon storage is driven by functional trait composition and stand structural attributes rather than biodiversity in temperate mixed forests recovering from disturbances (2018, background): “However, other studies found that increasing the heterogeneity of stand structure reduces aboveground biomass or productivity (Binkley et al. 2010; Ryan et al. 2010; Soares et al. 2017), but the direction of these relationships may vary across natural forests, plantations, and manipulated…”
- Increasing wood production through old age in tall trees (2010, background): “Similarly, post-maturity decline in stand-level growth has led to the near-universal assumption that tree-level growth exhibits a concomitant decline, but numerous studies have documented that larger or older trees can grow faster and more efficiently than smaller or younger trees (e.g., O’Hara, 199”
- Increasing stand structural heterogeneity reduces productivity in Brazilian Eucalyptus monoclonal stands (2016, methodology): “Conversely, however, recent studies show that structural heterogeneity, in the absence of species and genetic diversity, can reduce productivity by up to 20% (Binkley et al., 2010; Stape et al., 2010; Ryan et al., 2010; Aspinwall et al., 2011; Luu et al., 2013).”