Factors controlling Eucalyptus productivity: How water availability and stand structure alter production and carbon allocation

By Michael G. Ryan, Jose-Luiz Stape, D. Binkley, S. Fonseca, R. Loos, Ernesto N. Takahashi, C. R. Silva, S. Silva, Rodrigo E. Hakamada, J. Ferreira and 6 more. 2010

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7f223337f4ef992d40f7626d369bf88120bb4aa9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Increasing stand structural heterogeneity reduces productivity in Brazilian Eucalyptus monoclonal stands (2016, background): “…diversity, this study showed that stand heterogeneity, represented by Gini’s coefficient, was negatively related to stand production, in accordance our hypothesis (2) and with other studies (Stape et al., 2010; Luu et al., 2013; Binkley et al., 2010; Ryan et al., 2010; Aspinwall et al., 2011).”
Aboveground carbon storage is driven by functional trait composition and stand structural attributes rather than biodiversity in temperate mixed forests recovering from disturbances (2018, background): “However, other studies found that increasing the heterogeneity of stand structure reduces aboveground biomass or productivity (Binkley et al. 2010; Ryan et al. 2010; Soares et al. 2017), but the direction of these relationships may vary across natural forests, plantations, and manipulated…”
The interactions of climate, spacing and genetics on clonal Eucalyptus plantations across Brazil and Uruguay (2017, background): “The addition of supplemental water within sites also increases Eucalyptus wood growth, by 20–80% (Stape et al., 2008; Ryan et al., 2010).”
Insights from full-rotation Nelder spacing trials with Eucalyptus in São Paulo, Brazil (2010, background): “The causes of declines in forest growth as relatively young forests increase in age is a topic of great research interest (Gower et al. 1996, Ryan et al. 2004, 2010, Stape et al. 2010).”
Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (2017, background): “…diversity has also been found to have negative effects on productivity, and in some forest types increasing size heterogeneity can reduce productivity by 20% (Binkley et al. 2010; Ryan et al. 2010; Stape et al. 2010; Aspinwall et al. 2011; Luu et al. 2013; Bourdier et al. 2016; Soares et al. 2016).”