Tree diversity enhances tree transpiration in a Panamanian forest plantation

By N. Kunert, L. Schwendenmann, C. Potvin, Dirk Hölscher. 2012

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc1766dbd5451eaf8f1ac442f51af6c3a1d19a33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Tamm Review: On the strength of evidence when comparing ecosystem functions of mixtures with monocultures (2015, methodology): “, 2010), water (Forrester et al., 2010b; Moore et al., 2011; Kunert et al., 2012; Forrester, 2015) and light (Forrester and Albrecht, 2014).”
Tropical tree diversity enhances light capture through crown plasticity and spatial and temporal niche differences (2014, methodology): “Sap flux and percentage of foliage were measured from July 2007 to June 2008 (see Kunert et al. 2010, 2012 for details).”
Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments (2018, background): “Water relations have been the interest of some in tree diversity experiments (Kröber et al., 2015; Kröber and Bruelheide, 2014; Kunert et al., 2012; Lübbe et al., 2016a).”
Drought responses by individual tree species are not often correlated with tree species diversity in European forests (2016, unknown): “However, a second factor relates to the fact that these species interactions could result in an increase in growth and evapotranspiration in mixtures (Kunert et al. 2012; Forrester 2015), which could potentially result in greater water stress during hot or dry periods if soil water is depleted.”
Tree water uptake in a tropical plantation varying in tree diversity: interspecific differences, seasonal shifts and complementarity (2015, methodology): “…stand transpiration rates with the highest seepage rate in H. crepitans ( 6·13mmday 1, Sprenger et al., 2013; stand transpiration rate = 0·69mmday 1, Kunert et al., 2012) and the lowest seepage rate in L. seemannii ( 5·18mmday 1, Sprenger et al., 2013; stand transpiration rate = 2·62mmday 1,…”