Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions

By P. Kalaitzidakis, T. Mamuneas, Thanasis Stengos. 2003

597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Academic honors and performance (2014, methodology): “22–27, Table 2, column 1 Within Economics Impact Kalaitzidakis et al. (2003) p.”
Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses and Impacts (2018, background): “…or if one can rely on groups of contentious economists to offer similar evaluations.2 Citations, while hardly perfect measures of importance (see Kapeller 2010 and Wang, Veugelers, and Stephen 2016 for details on problems with citations) are an arguably objective way of judging the research…”
New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals (2006, unknown): “number of journals entered into the analysis because of the laborious work of counting characters (108 journals in Liebowitz and Palmer, 71 in Laband and Piette, 92 in Kalaitzidakis et al., and far fewer in other studies). Kalaitzidakis et al. included per‐article calculations in the”
Life Cycle and Cohort Productivity in Economic Research: The Case of Germany (2008, unknown): “Keywords: Research productivity; life cycles; cohort effects.”