New Approaches to Ranking Economics Journals

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Productive is Public Capital? A Meta-Analysis (2008, unknown): “Out of 51 published papers, six are published in top-20 journals (based on the ranking of Kodrzycki and Yu (2006)).”
WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM THREE DECADES OF RESEARCH ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF PUBLIC CAPITAL (2014, unknown): “(22)Based on the journal quality ranking of Kodrzycki and Yu (2006). Note that many studies in our data set do not appear on this journal list.”
Does Co‐authorship Lead to Higher Academic Productivity? (2015, unknown): “This measure is used in Ductor et al. (forthcoming) and is based on the work of Kodrzycki and Yu (2006) – hereafter KY. KY apply an iterative process and weight citations depending on the influence of the citing journal.”
Academic honors and performance (2014, methodology): “Ranking Index reference Index title LP method Kodrzycki and Yu (2006) p. 22–27, Table 2, column 1 Within Economics Impact Kalaitzidakis et al. (2003) p. 1349, Table 1, column 5 Impact, Age, and Self-Citations Adjusted per Number of Pages Kalaitzidakis et al. (2011) p. 1530, Table 1, column 2…”
Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008, unknown): “The common point in most of these approaches is the assessment of the quality of citations received by a journal (17–20).”