International new ventures: The cross-border nexus of individuals and opportunities

By Dante Di Gregorio, Martina Musteen, Douglas E. Thomas. 2008

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b55b508064bc63348f5c24318f693a13c7a7c59e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Offshore outsourcing as a source of international competitiveness for SMEs (2009, background): “In fact, the knowledge created as a result of crossborder human interaction (such as that occurring between SMEs and their offshore service providers) is likely to generate even more value, given its idiosyncratic character, and given the fact that such interactions combine individuals and resources”
International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis (2011, background): “Also, di Gregorio et al. (2008) argue that while INV formation is linkedwith entrepreneurial action to exploit opportunities (as are all entrepreneurial ventures), INVs are differentiated by the geographic dispersion of individuals, resources and market opportunities, and their ability to exploit…”
Strategic Entrepreneurial Internationalization: A Normative Framework (2017, background): “…advantage, the venture needs to create cross-border linkages, interactions, and resource and knowledge combinations that are more valuable than those available from domestic sources alone, and they also need to preempt similar combinations for potential competitors (Di Gregorio et al., 2008b).”
A multidimensional perspective of SME internationalization speed: The influence of entrepreneurial characteristics (2019, background): “Additionally, they view internationalization as an opportunity for value creation as well as taking advantage of market inefficiencies (Anokhin et al., 2011; Di Gregorio et al., 2008; Kalinic & Forza, 2012).”