Validation and Utility of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Diagnosing Mental Disorders in 1003 General Hospital Spanish Inpatients

By C. Díez-Quevedo, T. Rangil, L. Sanchez-Planell, K. Kroenke, R. Spitzer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2001

636 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b536de1c807db910bb58a342c7c58dba1d7fa2a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. B. Löwe
2. Janet B W Williams
3. R. Spitzer
4. K. Kroenke
5. D. McMillan
6. L. Manea
7. S. Gilbody
8. D. Eisenberg

In Social Psychology

1. K. Kroenke
2. B. Löwe
3. Janet B W Williams
4. R. Spitzer
5. D. Eisenberg
6. Ezra Golberstein
7. J. Hunt
8. D. McMillan

Citations in the corpus

• A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression. (2015, methodology): “Translated versions of the PHQ-9 were used in 16 studies, including Amharic [25], Dutch [32,37,44,45], German versions [27,34], Greek [29], Hebrew [21], Italian [38], Japanese [30,35], Persian [31], Spanish [22,36] and Thai [33].”
• Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses. (2004, methodology): “, 1999) and for the Spanish version in 2001 (Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001).”
• Help-Seeking and Access to Mental Health Care in a University Student Population (2007, methodology): “The PHQ-9 has not been validated specifically in college populations, but has been validated in a wide variety of other populations.(31,32,34,35,38) Symptoms of generalized anxiety and panic disorder over the past 4 weeks were measured using the PHQ anxiety module.”
• Mental Health and Academic Success in College (2009, methodology): “This screening tool has been validated as highly correlated with diagnosis by mental health professionals and more detailed assessment tools in a variety of populations and settings (Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001; Henkel et al., 2004; Kroenke et al., 2001; Martin et al., 2006; Spitzer et al., 1999).”
• The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. (2009, methodology): “It has been used in clinical ( Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001; Kroenkeand Spitzer, 2002) andpopulation-based settings (Martin et al., 2006) and is valid in self-administered (Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001; Kroenke et al., 2001) and telephone-administered modes (Pinto-Meza et al., 2005).”
• Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain (2020, methodology): “Psychological impact: possible symptomatology was measured using the following screening instruments: Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) (Kroenke et al., 2009; Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001).”
• Validity of the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. (2006, background): “While there is already a body of evidence that supports its validity in medical settings [8,10,11], no data are available on its validity in the general population.”