Validity of the Brief Patient Health Questionnaire Mood Scale (PHQ-9) in the general population.
By Alexandra Martin, W. Rief, Antje Klaiberg, E. Braehler. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2006
1,354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Oncology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5ca4442993f2015b521ee49c122e214702f2cba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- B. Löwe
- K. Kroenke
- Janet B W Williams
- R. Spitzer
- Elmar Brähler
- Andreas Hinz
- R. Kocalevent
- D. Eisenberg
In Oncology
- B. Löwe
- K. Kroenke
- R. Spitzer
- Janet B W Williams
- Elmar Brähler
- Andreas Hinz
- R. Kocalevent
- D. Eisenberg
In Social Psychology
- B. Löwe
- K. Kroenke
- Janet B W Williams
- R. Spitzer
- Elmar Brähler
- Andreas Hinz
- R. Kocalevent
- D. Eisenberg
Citations in the corpus
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Web-Based Treatment of Social Phobia Without Clinician Guidance (2009, methodology): “There were no significant differences between groups on the PHQ-9, K-10 or SDS, the secondary outcome measures.”
- The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review. (2010, methodology): “• Selection as the clinical tool used in the intervention arm of numerous randomized effectiveness trials in medical populations for monitoring and adjusting depression therapy [32,49,50,93–100] • Use in its full or abbreviated forms in large federallysponsored surveys and programs including the Beh”
- Mental Health and Academic Success in College (2009, methodology): “This screening tool has been validated as highly correlated with diagnosis by mental health professionals and more detailed assessment tools in a variety of populations and settings (Diez-Quevedo et al., 2001; Henkel et al., 2004; Kroenke et al., 2001; Martin et al., 2006; Spitzer et al., 1999).”
- Depression and anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: A web-based cross-sectional survey (2020, methodology): “The reason for choosing PHQ-9 was that it proved to be a useful tool for detecting depression [31].”
- The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria (2020, neutral): “Comparable representative population studies found that 4% scored above this cut-off in 2006 [36], or 6% in 2013 [37], and again 4% in an Austrian sample in 2014 (but measured with the PHQ-8) [32].”
- A systematic review of studies of depression prevalence in university students. (2013, result): “2%) (Martin et al., 2006; Yu et al., 2011) in comparison to our results where the weighted prevalence mean was 47.”
- Mental Health in American Colleges and Universities: Variation Across Student Subgroups and Across Campuses (2013, neutral): “This screen has been validated as highly correlated with diagnoses by clinicians and other depression assessment tools in a variety of populations, including young adults (Lowe et al., 2004; Martin et al., 2006).”
- The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. (2009, methodology): “4.3% and 4.8% in the BRFSS sample) ( Martin et al., 2006 ).”
- Standardization of the depression screener patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population. (2013, result): “Aspects of construct validity of the PHQ-9 have also been reported in previous studies conducted in medical settings and in the general population, showing strong associations of the PHQ-9 depression severity score with different aspects of health-related quality of life [8,13].”
- Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of FCV-19S (2020, background): ““Feeling tired or having little energy”) and is proved to be a useful tool to recognize major depression and subclinical levels of depressive symptoms in the general population (Martin et al. 2006).”