Testing ESL Pragmatics
By C. Röver. 2005
156 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5347e793834c65f6884157d1c003464bc5fab89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
Citations in the corpus
- Speaking in turns and sequences: Interactional competence as a target construct in testing speaking (2018, background): “The latter emphasizes the purposes of speakers’ linguistic choices and their effects on interlocutors, and assesses the appropriateness, conventionality and effectiveness of their utterances (Grabowski, 2013; Roever, 2005; Youn, 2015).”
- THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATIC COMPREHENSION (2008, methodology): “Not all learners gain equally during their time abroad; ~b! pragmatic development occurs in a FL environment; and ~c! some aspects of pragmatics improve more than others+ A line of study-abroad research has revealed differential degrees of gain among learners in a host country and has documented tha”
- Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research (2016, background): “…comparing a group of learners in a study abroad program with their counterparts in a domestic, formal instructional setting (Bardovi-Harlig & Dörnyei 1998; Matsumura 2001; Niezgoda & Röver 2001; Röver 2005; Schauer 2006; Shimizu 2009; Taguchi 2008a, 2011; Félix-Brasdefer & Hasler-Barker 2015).”
- Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing (2008, unknown): “Finally, in relation to the third group, that of self-report data, although the use of diaries (Cohen, 1997; DuFon, 1999) or verbal protocols (Cohen & Olshtain, 1993; Roever, 2005) may provide information on learners’ cognitive processes, this type of data has not often been used in classroom resear”