Measuring cyberbullying: Implications for research

By Justin W. Patchin, Sameer Hinduja. 2015

375 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b45aeda44c1faa5a44abbc7d5f2233cb9c758413

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Zsolt Demetrovics
3. Annarita Sorrentino
4. Constantinos M. Kokkinos
5. A. Baldry
6. David P. Farrington

In Social Psychology

1. David P. Farrington
2. A. Baldry
3. Constantinos M. Kokkinos
4. Mark D. Griffiths
5. Zsolt Demetrovics
6. Orsolya Király
7. Annarita Sorrentino
8. Kağan Kırcaburun

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mark D. Griffiths
2. Kağan Kırcaburun
3. Zsolt Demetrovics
4. Orsolya Király
5. Constantinos M. Kokkinos
6. T. Çolak
7. Annarita Sorrentino
8. A. Baldry

Citations in the corpus

• School Bullying and Cyberbullying Among Boys and Girls: Roles and Overlap (2017, background): “This scale serves the purpose of addressing a wide spectrum of different possible forms of cyberbullying (Menesini et al., 2012; Patchin & Hinduja, 2015).”
• Problematic Online Behaviors among Adolescents and Emerging Adults: Associations between Cyberbullying Perpetration, Problematic Social Media Use, and Psychosocial Factors (2018, methodology): “^ It was developed by Patchin and Hinduja (2015) and adapted to Turkish by the researchers.”