Group identity and intergroup relations The common in-group identity model

By John F. Dovidio, S. Gaertner, Gladys Kafati. 2000

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3d5b4d4afbd13f3d1301b5d39aea02acb52b7cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. John F. Dovidio
2. S. Gaertner
3. Tamar Saguy
4. David M. Amodio
5. D. W. Sue
6. Karen A. Jehn
7. M. Hebl
8. K. Kawakami

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John F. Dovidio
2. S. Gaertner
3. Tamar Saguy
4. Gordon Hodson
5. David M. Amodio
6. Miles Hewstone
7. D. W. Sue
8. Adam R. Pearson

Citations in the corpus

• Another view of “we”: Majority and minority group perspectives on a common ingroup identity (2007, background): “…be elicited experimentally by simultaneously emphasising common university affiliation and subgroup identities, as opposed to just the common identity or the different group identities, either in the context of cooperative relations (González & Brown, 2003, 2006) or not (Dovidio et al., 2000b).”