Word Frequency in Lexical Diffusion and the Source of Morphophonological Change
By Joan L. Bybee. 2007
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b3820d5cac94e77470f4b5ca33f668196f131b16
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Florent Perek
- Peggy W. Y. Wong
- Peggy Mok
- Donghui Zuo
- Joan Bybee
- Susanne Gahl
- Maryellen C. MacDonald
- R. Schmidt
In Language and Linguistics
- Florent Perek
- Peggy W. Y. Wong
- Peggy Mok
- Donghui Zuo
- Joan Bybee
- Susanne Gahl
- Nick C. Ellis
- Maryellen C. MacDonald
Citations in the corpus
- Production and perception of a sound change in progress: Tone merging in Hong Kong Cantonese (2013, background): “Hooper (1976) and Bybee (2007) distinguished two types of word frequency effects on sound change.”
- Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives (2015, background): “Frequent words are also more resistant to morphosyntactic change (Bybee, 1985, 1995; Bybee & Slobin, 1982; Hooper, 1976).”
- From Usage to Grammar: The Mind's Response to Repetition (2007, background): “My proposal to explain this tendency (Hooper 1976, Bybee 1985) is that frequency strengthens the memory representations of words or phrases, making them easier to access whole and thus less likely to be subject to analogical reformation.”