Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis
By Robert D. Mohr. 2002
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b33d60eba7874fea29ec501e74de452cb266cc89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dylan G. Rassier
- Ralf Martin
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- Misato Sato
- Myra Mohnen
- Dietrich Earnhart
- A. Stefan
- A. Fard
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- Dietrich Earnhart
- A. Stefan
- L. Paul
- Marcus Wagner
- R. Brännlund
- Misato Sato
- Ralf Martin
Citations in the corpus
- The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? (2010, unknown): “Mohr (2002) finds that when the return on a firm’s R&D investment is partly captured by its competitors, firms underinvest in cleaner and more productive technologies.”
- Environmental policy without costs? : A review of the Porter hypothesis (2009, background): “7 See Roediger-Schluga (2004) for a discussion in relation to the Porter hypthesis.”
- Strategic quality competition and the Porter Hypothesis (2009, background): “Mohr [ 10 ] argues that an environmental policy that produces results”
- Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence (2020, background): “Theoretical models (Kennedy, 1994; Simpson and Bradford, 1996; Xepapadeas and Zeeuw, 1999; Ambec and Barla, 2002; Greaker, 2003; Mohr, 2002; Feichtinger et al., 2005) and empirical evidence (Berman and Bui, 2001; Alpay et al.”
- Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview (2008, background): “In the economic literature, the PH has been criticized for its lack of theoretical foundation (Palmer et al., 1995). It rests on the idea that firms systematically ignore profitable opportunities, in contradiction of the standard assumption of profitmaximizing firms subject to competitive market pre”
- Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis (2011, unknown): “, 2004) or in learning-by-doing (Mohr, 2002), or market power (Simpson and Bradford, 1996, Greaker, 2003).”
- The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017, background): “In this situation, the introduction of an environmental regulation would induce firms to switch to the new, cleaner technology, which improves environmental quality and eventually increases productivity (Mohr 2002).”
- Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms (2010, background): “In particular, this survey cites Ambec and Barla (2007a), Brännlund et al. (1995), Brunnermeier and Levinson (2004), D’Aspremont and Jacquemin (1988), Dufour et al. (1998), Gabel and Sinclair-Desgagne (1998), Kennedy (1994), Mohr (2002), and Simpson and Bradford (1996).”