A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997)

By Koen Frenken. 2000

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b333675f34d803c4ffe04185a25c4c061531c315

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. P. Oinas
2. J. Bergh
3. Christoph H. Loch
4. E. Malecki
5. Svenja C. Sommer

In Strategy and Management

1. E. Malecki
2. P. Oinas
3. J. Bergh
4. Christoph H. Loch
5. Svenja C. Sommer
6. Ron A. Boschma
7. Anne L. J. ter Wal
8. Michaela Trippl

Citations in the corpus

• Optimal Diversity: Increasing Returns versus Recombinant Innovation (2008, background): “The NK complexity model (Kauffman 1993, Frenken 2000) stresses the combinatorial nature of design space.”
• The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems (2002, background): “Thus, even a narrowly specialized region may be a substantial contributor if the part of the technology that it creates happens to be crucial at some point in time (Frenken 2000; Frenken and Leydesdorff 2000).”
• Selectionism and Learning in Projects with Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty (2004, methodology): “Several authors have used local search as an analogy for strategic decision making (e.g., Levinthal 1997, Rivkin 2000, Gavetti and Levinthal 2000) and technical innovations (e.g., Auerwald et al. 2000; Kauffman et al. 2000; Frenken 2000, 2001).”
• Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics (2009, unknown): “The usual disclaimer applies.”